Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
Out of E. M. Forster’s _A Passage to India_ (1924) comes a
compassionate plea for British understanding of India. But even
understanding is not enough; there must also be love. This great
subcontinent, divided by geography, economics, caste, and religion,
has a heritage of misery and discord. The book’s two great themes are
the divisions which sunder India and the love which alone can make it
whole. It has been taken by the British without love in a union which
is rape. In one of the parallels which inform the theme, this action
is represented on the interpersonal level by the projected loveless
marriage of Adela Quested and British civil servant Ronny Heaslop. The
novel moves to a climax when the hysterical Adela mistakenly accuses
the sensitive Dr. Aziz, a Mohammedan Indian, of attempted rape in the
sinister Marabar caves. Aziz is acquitted, but his career is ruined
and his spirit desolated. But the influence of Ronny’s dead mother,
Mrs. Moore, returns, through the memory of her and the presence of her
two other children, to dispel some of the evil. At the book’s end Aziz
achieves a partial reconciliation with Cyril Fielding, the Englishman
who has defended him at the cost of ostracism. But as they part Aziz
shouts:
If it’s fifty-five hundred years we shall get rid of you, yes, we
shall drive every blasted Englishman into the sea, and then ... you
and I shall be friends.
As an appeal either for love or withdrawal from India, the book is a
political instrument. It is also a revealing commentary upon one of
the causes of what Winston Churchill called “the dismemberment of the
British Empire.”
=Aldous Huxley and George Orwell: The Future in Perspective=
Huxley’s _Brave New World_ (1932) and Orwell’s _1984_, which followed
it seventeen years later, are political instruments through the honor
and revulsion they will create in any reader whose political beliefs
are formed by the democratic tradition. Although both these fine novels
are written in the future, neither is a fairy tale spun from air. Their
only resemblance to fairy tales is a horde of enough all-too-real
goblins and witches to make a month of _Walpurgisnachts_. Huxley, using
godlessness and immorality, and Orwell, using totalitarian government,
create nightmares well calculated to increase resistance to tendencies
in modern life which could produce the results so strikingly conjured
up in their novels.
THE CONTINENT
=Ivan Turgenev and Fyodor Dostoyevsky: Nihilism and Its Rejection=
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account