London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
costermonger than dedicated to a retail business, tying up candles at a
grocer’s, or giving change for a shilling across a counter. She would
rather, she declared on one occasion, see him articled to a shoemaker
or a tailor.
A stationer in a neighbouring street had affixed to his window a
written notice that he was in want of a smart errand-boy, and Pinnie,
on hearing of it, had presented Hyacinth to his consideration. The
stationer was a dreadful bullying man, with a patch over his eye, who
seemed to think the boy would be richly remunerated with three
shillings a week; a contemptible measure, as it seemed to the
dressmaker, of his rare abilities and acquirements. His schooling had
been desultory, precarious, and had had a certain continuity mainly in
his early years, while he was under the care of an old lady who
combined with the functions of pew-opener at a neighbouring church the
manipulation, in the Place itself, where she resided with her sister, a
monthly nurse, of such pupils as could be spared (in their families)
from the more urgent exercise of holding the baby and fetching the
beer. Later, for a twelvemonth, Pinnie had paid five shillings a week
for him at an ‘Academy’ in a genteel part of Islington, where there was
an ‘instructor in the foreign languages’, a platform for oratory, and a
high social standard, but where Hyacinth suffered from the fact that
almost all his mates were the sons of dealers in edible
articles—pastry-cooks, grocers and fishmongers—and in this capacity
subjected him to pangs and ignominious contrasts by bringing to school,
for their exclusive consumption, or for exchange and barter, various
buns, oranges, spices, and marine animals, which the boy, with his
hands in his empty pockets and the sense of a savourless home in his
heart, was obliged to see devoured without his participation. Miss
Pynsent would not have pretended that he was highly educated, in the
technical sense of the word, but she believed that at fifteen he had
read almost every book in the world. The limits of his reading were, in
fact, only the limits of his opportunity. Mr Vetch, who talked with him
more and more as he grew older, knew this, and lent him every volume he
possessed or could pick up for the purpose. Reading was his happiness,
and the absence of any direct contact with a library his principal
source of discontent; that is, of that part of his discontent which he
could speak out. Mr Vetch knew that he was really clever, and therefore
thought it a woful pity that he could not have furtherance in some
liberal walk; but he would have thought it a greater pity still that so
bright a lad should be condemned to measure tape or cut slices of
cheese. He himself had no influence which he could bring into play, no
connection with the great world of capital or the market of labour.
That is, he touched these mighty institutions at but one very small
point—a point which, such as it was, he kept well in mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account