The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction. — John Shaqi
The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction.Cicero, Marcus Tullius
Philosophy
The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius
Political science -- Early works to 1800; State, The -- Early works to 1800
The third book opens with a philosophical analysis of the faculties of
man, introductory to the great principle of the immutable nature of
justice, which it appears was fully discussed in this book, of which so
small a portion is preserved. A splendid picture is drawn in the second
section of an accomplished statesman, such as Cicero himself had aimed
to be, and which from a passage in one of his letters to Atticus,
appears to have been farther elaborated in the sixth book. It relates to
a triumph about which he felt some anxiety after his government of
Cilicia. “If this idea of a triumph which even you approve, had not been
infused into me, you would not have had to look far for the perfect
citizen described in the sixth book.”[10] Philus is called upon to
defend the cause of injustice after the manner of Carneades the Greek
sophist. The powerful passage contained in the seventeenth section is
delivered by him. It was reserved for Lælius to close the discussion as
the advocate of justice. Scarce any part of his discourse is preserved.
Some fragments have, however, been collected by Professor Mai, preserved
by Nonius the Philologist, and by Lactantius. In the one, Lælius is made
to declare, that the Roman youth ought not to be permitted to listen to
Carneades, who if he thought as he spoke, was a bad man; and if he was
not, as he preferred to believe, his discourse was nevertheless
detestable. One of the passages from Lanctantius is that well known
exposition of eternal right, or natural law of justice of which
conscience is the voice.
“There is indeed a law, right reason, which is in accordance with
nature; existing in all, unchangeable, eternal. Commanding us to do what
is right, forbidding us to do what is wrong. It has dominion over good
men, but possesses no influence over bad ones. No other law can be
substituted for it, no part of it can be taken away, nor can it be
abrogated altogether. Neither the people or the senate can absolve us
from it. It wants no commentator or interpreter. It is not one thing at
Rome, and another thing at Athens: one thing to-day, and another thing
to-morrow; but it is a law eternal and immutable for all nations and for
all time. God, the sole Ruler, and universal Lord, has framed and
proclaimed this law. He who does not obey it, renounces himself, and is
false to his own nature: he brings upon himself the direst tortures,
even when he escapes human punishments.”[11]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account