The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction. — John Shaqi
The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction.Cicero, Marcus Tullius
Philosophy
The republic of Cicero: Translated from the Latin; and Accompanied With a Critical and Historical Introduction.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius
Political science -- Early works to 1800; State, The -- Early works to 1800
He also said, for many times and willingly I listened to him, that
Zethus the author of Pacuvius, was too great an enemy to science. The
Neoptolemus of Ennius pleased him more; who says that he likes to
philosophize but only with a few; not willing to give himself up to it
altogether. But if the studies of the Greeks delight you so much, there
are others freer and more easily diffused, which we may bring to the use
of life, or even to that of the republic. As for these arts, their value
consists, if in any thing, in stimulating and sharpening the genius of
young boys; enabling them in this manner the better to comprehend
greater things.
XIX. “I do not dissent from you, Lælius,” said Tubero, “but ask what you
understand by greater things?”
Lælius. “I will tell you in good faith, although you may somewhat
despise me for it; since it is you who are asking Scipio about these
celestial matters. As for myself, I think those things most worthy of
our attention, which lay immediately before our eyes. How can it
interest me that the grandson of L. Paulus by the mother’s side, born of
such a noble and illustrious family in this republic, should seek for
reasons why two suns have been seen, when he does not inquire the cause
why two senates, and almost two people exist in one republic? For as you
perceive the death of Tiberius Gracchus, and even before that event, the
whole proceedings of his tribunate were dividing one people into two
parties: those who are the detractors of Scipio also, and are envious of
him, urged on at first by P. Crassus and Appius Claudius, keep up
notwithstanding their death, an opposition to us in the senate, through
the influence of Metellus and P. Mucius. Nor will they suffer him to
come forward, who is alone equal to so dangerous a crisis, amidst the
factious and dangerous associations made under the Roman name: amidst
violated compacts, and the new matters daily stirring by the seditious
triumvirs, to the consternation of good and respectable men. Wherefore
young men, if you will listen to me, entertain no apprehensions about
this double sun: for either it is nothing at all, or if it is a reality,
as far as it has been observed, there is nothing injurious in it. Either
we can know nothing about such matters, or even if we could know all
about them, we should not be better or happier for that knowledge. But
one senate and one people we may have; that is practicable. And if it is
not done, we shall suffer for it. And we know it is otherwise, and that
if it were effected, we should have more stability, and be happier and
better.”
XX. Then Mucius. “What is it we have to learn, in your opinion, Lælius,
that we may be able to effect what you require of us?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account