The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
After the war of 1877–78 we set to work to study our weak points, in
order to eliminate our faults. Much must have been accomplished since
then, for the tactical training of the army at the beginning of the
recent war was undoubtedly of a higher standard than it was twenty-five
years ago. Still, in some matters we had not progressed, while in
others we had actually gone back. The duty of training the troops rests
with commanding officers of all ranks, and the responsibility for this
extends right up to those in command of military districts. Although
the same drill-books and manuals are used by the whole army, there
is considerable variety in the way that the tactical instruction is
imparted, owing to the diverse views held by the district commanders.
I have taken part in many manœuvres, and was in command of the army
at the grand manœuvres at Kursk in 1902, and I noted down what I
considered to be our principal failings in this respect. In October,
1903, I submitted a report on the subject to the Tsar, in which my
conclusions on certain points were as follows:
“1. _Staff Work with the Main Army and with Detached Columns at
the Grand Manœuvres._
“Generally speaking, the staff work cannot be characterized
as entirely satisfactory. The principal reasons for this were
the somewhat unhappy selection of the officers appointed to
be chiefs of the different staffs, the poor organization of
the staffs themselves, due to a limited personnel and to an
insufficient supply of the means of communication [telegraph
and telephone equipment] for both the troops and staffs, and
the neglect to arrange proper intercommunication between units
by making use of mounted orderlies, automobiles, or cyclists.
Intelligence of the enemy as well as of the disposition
of other units was always received late by those whom it
concerned, because the cavalry was badly organized, and could
not carry out its orders properly.
“The amount of writing done by the various staff-officers was
colossal. They worked the whole evening and all night; their
effusions were lithographed or printed, and were sent off in
all directions; but the orders were rarely received by the
troops in proper time. At the manœuvres of the Warsaw Military
District in 1899, cases came under my notice of general
officers commanding divisions receiving the order to move in
the morning two hours after the time appointed for them to
start.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account