The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
“In many instances staff-officers with troops seemed ignorant
of how a reconnaissance should be carried out, and consequently
did not gauge the dispositions of the enemy’s forces with
sufficient accuracy. This reacted in turn on the dispositions
made by the chief commanders, more particularly in their
employment of the reserves (Kursk manœuvres and those at Pskoff
and Vlodava). Similarly, they did not know how to arrange for
the maintenance of touch along the front and to the rear,
a defect which caused a delay in the receipt of orders and
information which was quite avoidable.
“2. _Work of the Cavalry at Manœuvres._
“The increased importance now attached to the strategic or
independent duties of cavalry has, in my opinion, acted
detrimentally upon the cavalry work with the troops. The
spirit of the strategic rôle was in most cases not properly
grasped, and the chief idea of the masses of mounted troops of
both sides appeared to be to meet each other. They therefore
neglected to furnish the commanders of their sides with the
information of the enemy, so necessary before an action, and
left the infantry without their co-operation during the actual
combat; this was the same whether they were acting in attack or
defence. Long-distance patrols often did useful work, but owing
to the lack of proper means for the quick transmission of the
information collected, it reached the troops to whom it might
be useful after the enemy’s dispositions had been changed.
The near patrols did not work in with the long-distance ones.
Our mounted troops were frequently allowed to lose touch with
the enemy at night under the pretext that the men and horses
required rest, and the employment of a dozen troopers was
grudged after dark, when by day whole divisions and corps were
futilely marched and countermarched, and sent upon duties which
were not always in accordance with the general idea of the
operations.
“The cavalry work should be more strictly in co-operation with
that of the other arms than it is at present, and all officers
in command of mounted units should remember that their rôle is
auxiliary, and largely consists in assisting the General in
command to come to a proper decision by the completeness and
accuracy of the information they send back; that the cavalry
should help the commanders, firstly, to frame a plan of action,
then to crush the enemy on the field of battle.
“3. _Attack and the Defence._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account