The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East — John Shaqi
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
“Here again information was wanting. When commanders made up
their minds either to attack or to stand on the defensive, they
were never able to feel, from their information of the enemy
and the locality, that they thoroughly knew what they were
doing, or that it really was in accordance with the spirit of
the general idea. We were strong in the defence, but we rarely
delivered a soundly conceived or executed attack. In the attack
column commanders did not always take pains to obtain enough
accurate information as to the dispositions and strength of the
enemy, so as to be able to appreciate the situation properly
and draw up a reasoned plan of battle, to select the direction
of the main attack, to allot the troops for it, and take steps
to deceive the enemy as to its precise direction. When they had
massed sufficient first-line troops for the main attack, they
did not also move up the reserves of all arms.
“In particular, we did not know how to conduct the advance, and
then deliver the assault with proper preparation by artillery
and rifle fire. Many commanders seem, unfortunately, to be
wedded to the idea of carrying out a continuous advance without
making any use of the rifle. If we ever encounter an enemy,
such as the Germans, who systematically train their troops to
advance under cover of their own heavy rifle-fire, we shall be
worsted, for in peace we often advance almost without firing a
rifle to a range of 1,000 or even 800 paces of the position.
“The guns also frequently ceased fire at the same critical
period—_i.e._, when their attacking infantry are nearing the
enemy. My inquiries as to the reason for this were usually
met with the reply that their ammunition was expended. If
the absolute necessity for keeping in hand a considerable
number of rounds for the assistance of the decisive infantry
attack is not realized now that we have quick-firing guns, our
artillery will in war become useless at the very moment when
its co-operation is most vital.
“In defence we are better than in the attack, and we know how
to make the most of the fire effect of both guns and rifles.
The ranges in front of a position are usually measured and
clearly marked. But proper use is not made of reserves. We do
not, as we should, throw them into the firing-line, so as to
increase the volume of fire after the enemy’s main attack has
developed, nor do we launch them in a fierce counter-attack
after he has come within decisive range. The reserves are
often kept in mass, and thrown against the attack without any
supporting rifle-fire. Many regiments and brigades told off as
reserves to a defensive position go through the whole manœuvres
without firing a single round.
“4. _The Revival of the Column Formation in the Attack._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account