The Russo-Japanese Conflict: Its Causes and IssuesAsakawa, Kan'ichi
History
The Russo-Japanese Conflict: Its Causes and Issues
Asakawa, Kan'ichi
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905 -- Causes
In East Asia are included Korea, China, Hong-kong, British India,
French Indo-China, Dutch East Indies, the Straits Settlements, Siam,
the Philippines, and Russian Eastern Asia. If Hong-kong, an
essentially transit-trade port, is excluded, the East Asiatic trade of
Japan amounts to 264,476,239 _yen_, or 43.6 per cent. of the entire
foreign trade of Japan. See the _Kwampō_ (Official Gazette of Japan),
No. 6199 (March 4, 1904), p. 74, table 4.
Of the three great divisions of Japan’s markets, Europe sells her
machineries and articles of general consumption, and buys in return
such peculiar products of her soil as silks and teas. East Asia,
including India and the southern islands, takes coal and manufactured
goods in general and furnishes cotton, food-stuffs, and other articles
of more direct need than the European goods. America occupies a unique
position in regard to Japan, as it combines to a large extent the
peculiarities of both Europe and East Asia: it exports to Japan cotton
and flour, besides machinery and goods of general consumption, and
imports from her, not only raw silk and tea, but also smaller
manufactured articles.
Footnote 22:
Oil-cakes are used as manure. As to rice, wheat, and flour, it is
unnecessary to say that their importation depends largely upon the
conditions of the crop at home.
Footnote 23:
The present author has often met persons who misinterpreted the “open
door” to mean the complete throwing open of a country to the ruthless
exploitation of the foreigner. The “open door,” it is needless to say,
merely negatives a differential treatment in favor of one or more
foreign nations at the expense of all the others. It does not
necessarily imply a wide opening, but an impartial, even if narrow,
opening for all nations.
Footnote 24:
Consult the British _Diplomatic and Consular Reports_, Annual Series,
Nos. 2995 and 2999; the U. S. _Monthly Summary of Commerce and
Finance_, January, 1904, pp. 2410–1; the _Kokumin_, September 19–21,
1901; Minister Kiyoura’s address before the Osaka Chamber of Commerce,
February, 1904.
Footnote 25:
The figures were taken from the _Monthly Summary of Commerce and
Finance of the United States_ for February, 1904, p. 3006.
Footnote 26:
From _ibid._, p. 3006. In 1903, rice imported amounted to 51,960,000
_yen_ in value. The _Fourth Annual_, p. 77.
Footnote 27:
See the U. S. _Monthly Summary_, February, 1904, pp. 3006 and 3013.
Footnote 28:
At present, Chinese merchants in Korea compete with the Japanese only
at the ports on the western coast, principally in the import trade of
silk. The number of the Chinese residents in Korea is one tenth that
of the Japanese, or about 4000.
Footnote 29:
The _Kokumin_, January 30, 1904.
Footnote 30:
Based on the figures in the _British Diplomatic and Consular Report:
Trade of Corea for the Year 1903_, pp. 11–13.
Footnote 31:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account