The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery — John Shaqi
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
Science
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. Galen and Aëtius have not treated of this article. Our author
copies from Dioscorides, who, under the name of ἀκακαλὶς, describes it
as an Egyptian plant, resembling the myrica (i, 118.) We may therefore
conjecture, with considerable probability, that it is merely some species
or variety of the tamarix. It does not appear that it is treated of by
the Arabians, nor have we found it in the works of Hippocrates or Celsus.
Ἀκακία,
Acacia is of the third order of desiccants, and of the first of cooling
medicines; but if washed, of the second. It is sour and terrene.
* * * * *
COMMENTARY. Dioscorides describes the acacia as being a thorny tree or
shrub, not erect, having a white flower and fruit like lupine, inclosed
in pods, from which is expressed the juice that is afterwards dried in
the shade (i, 133.) It was much disputed among the older commentators on
Dioscorides whether or not this description applies to the _Acacia vera_;
but since the time of Prosper Alpinus, it has been generally decided in
the affirmative by all scholars, with the exception of Dierbach, who
contends in favour of the _A. Senegal_, without any good reason, as
far as we can see. This gum was used medicinally by the authors of the
Hippocratic collection, who prescribe it as an astringent in hemorrhages,
for which purpose it is also recommended by Celsus (v. 1.) Serapion and
the others merely copy from Dioscorides and Galen. See in particular
Avicenna (ii, 2, 3.)
Ἀκαλύφη,
Urtica, _the Nettle_; the fruit and leaves are composed of fine
particles, and are desiccative without pungency; they dispel and cleanse
swellings, loosen the bowels, are moderately flatulent, and therefore
incite to venery.
* * * * *
COMMENTARY. This article is either the _Urtica dioica_, or the
_pilulifera_; or both species were comprehended under it. In the modern
Greek Pharmacopœia, the _pilulifera_ stands first (p. 164.) Galen, like
our author, calls it aphrodisiacal. Macer Floridus recommends it strongly
as being calefacient and stimulant. Both Dioscorides and Galen agree
in commending it as an expectorant when the chest is loaded with thick
humours. The Arabians treat of it at considerable length. See Avicenna
(ii, 2, 714); Serapion (c. 150); Rhases (Cont. l. ult.; 152.)
Ἄκανθος,
Acanthus, _Bears-breech_ (called also Melamphyllon and Pæderos), has
discutient and desiccative powers.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account