The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
That there has been such a clearly marked reactionary influence,
if not domination, over our studies, is so patently obvious that
it hardly needs to be stressed. Even those who have not subscribed
to any form of political doctrine have felt it safer to make
interpretations of the facts of race and heredity in such terms
that they can bear a clearly egalitarian interpretation.... The
anxiety which is shown to suppress publications and expositions
which do not support egalitarianism is entirely consistent with
this political direction of, and domination over, science....
[W]e wish to state categorically what are the views of the
editors on the matter of racial equality. While rejecting racial
egalitarianism as having no warranty in honest scientific
expositions and investigations, we do not, on the other hand,
subscribe to doctrines of racial _superiority_ or _inferiority_.
We believe that just as all individuals within a particular stock
are different, so is one racial group in relation to another.
In respect of some characters, various stocks will be superior
to others; and in other cases inferior; but in many cases no
perceptible differences may be apparent. While environment, both
physical and social, may influence these characters, we believe
that heredity is by far the most important single factor, and
the current fashion to eschew the significance of heredity is
a definite disservice to the understanding of what makes for
differences in the various characters which distinguish one group
from another.
Furthermore, we do not presume to judge what is desirably superior
or not. We think that within the ambit of the type of civilizations
erected by the White-Brown stocks or the Yellow races, the
Black, which has shown no natural predilection to that form of
organization, will be at a disadvantage in any competition--and
is _in that sense_ inferior. After all, a _priori_ considerations
alone would lead to this conclusion, and if modern science thinks
this is not the case, it has yet to show why and how the Melanoids
have remained technologically backward compared to both the
Mongoloids and the Caucasoids. For the Egyptian civilization,
which was basically Caucasoid (Mediterranean, Atlantic, Nordic,
and Armenoid strains being the basis of that nationality), abutted
on the Negroid world of Africa, and its ideas were there to be
accepted and copied, so that urban technological civilizations
could have been erected in Africa, if that way of life had appealed
to the inherent Negroid genius and temperament. It is only within
this last millennium that certain ideas generated in Egypt four
millennia ago began to reach West Africa--long after the Nile
Valley civilization had decayed and disappeared.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account