The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
The question that never seems to be convincingly answered is _why_
the Negro race, in Toynbee’s phrase, is the only race that has failed
to make a creative contribution to civilization. What can account
for the singular failure of the Negro people, alone among the major
divisions of man, to enter the mainstream of political, cultural, and
economic history?
The first rationalization that is given is that the physical
conditions of sub-Saharan Africa imposed such fearful disadvantages
that the development of a “civilization” was patently impossible.
The argument simply will not hold up. As many geographers and
anthropologists have observed (in a day before such observations were
reviewed as blasphemy), parts of Africa were perhaps “uninhabitable,”
but other parts were not. In any event, the jungles of the Congo
imposed no obstacles to Negroid peoples greater than those faced by
the Mayans in the jungles of Chiapas.
And consider the Mayans: They carved out of the rain forests of
Yucatán--out of an area Van Hagen has termed “the least likely place
one would choose for developing a culture”--a civilization that
can be identified, and studied, and photographed to this day. They
raised great temple cities: Tikal, Uaxactun, Calakmul. They built
roads and reservoirs. They developed complex ideographic writing, a
twenty-day lunar calendar, a code of laws for crime and punishment,
a flourishing industry in dyeing and weaving. To compare the crude
phallic fetishism of Negroid tribes with the highly developed art of
the Mayan and the Incan civilizations is to engage in a travesty upon
critical judgment.
It is complained of the early Negroes that they were “isolated,” that
no maritime access was possible to the African interior, hence that
they had no opportunity for contact with the cultures of Europe and
the Mediterranean. This is a specious argument, too. Every standard
history of Africa makes plain, implicitly or explicitly, that early
Negroes did indeed have contact with the outer world. Phoenicians,
Arabs, Libyans, Hamites all found their way across Africa. Romans
came, and Persians, Chinese, Turks, Berbers, Indians, Portuguese.
Nothing aroused the Negro from his primitive sleep. He did not adapt.
He did not copy. He did not profit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account