In further proof that the position of Baptists as to the Lord's Supper is correct and Scriptural; that the difficulty lies with baptism, and not with the Supper; and that they must still continue to restrict the ordinance to baptized believers, or else admit that sprinkling is baptism, we cite the concessions of distinguished Pedobaptist scholars and Divines in evidence on our side. JUSTIN MARTYR, one of the early Christian Fathers, says of the Supper: "This food is called by us the Eucharist, of which it is not lawful for any one to partake but such as believe the things taught by us to be true, and have been baptized." _Apol. I, C. 65. 66. See Schaff's Church Hist., Ch. 2. p. 516._ MOSHEIM, in his Church History, says: "Neither those doing penance, nor those not yet baptized, were allowed to be present at the celebration of this ordinance." _Eccl. Hist., Cent. 3, Part 2, Ch. 4, Sec. 3._ NEANDER, the great church historian, says: "At this celebration, as may be easily concluded, no one could be present who was not a member of the Christian Church, and incorporated into it by the rite of baptism." _Ch. Hist., Vol. 1., 327. Boston, 1849._ CAVE, one of the ablest writers on Christian antiquities, says the participants in the primitive church were those "that had embraced the doctrine of the Gospel, and had been baptized into the faith of Christ. For, looking upon the Lord's Supper as the highest and most solemn act of religion, they thought they could never take care enough in the dispensing of it." _Prim. Christ., Part I., Ch. 11, p. 333._ BINGHAM, in his able work on the Antiquities of the Christian Church, says of the early Christians: "As soon as a man was baptized he was communicated"--that is, admitted to the communion. Baptism, therefore, essentially preceded the Supper.--_Christ. Antiq., B. 12, Ch. 4, Sec. 9, B. 15, Ch. 3._ DOCTOR WALL, who searched the records of antiquity for facts illustrating the history of the ordinances, says: "No church ever gave the communion to any persons before they were baptized. Among all the absurdities that were ever held, none ever maintained that any person should partake of the communion before he was baptized." _Hist. Inf. Bap., Part II., Ch. 9._ DOCTOR COLEMAN says of the early churches: "None indeed but believers in full communion with the church were permitted to be present." "But agreeably to all the laws and customs of the church, baptism constituted membership with the church. All baptized persons were legitimately numbered among the communicants as members of the church." _Anc. Christ. Exemp., Ch. 21, Sec. 8._ DOCTOR SCHAFF says: "The communion was a regular part, and, in fact, the most important and solemn part of the Sunday worship, . . . in which none but full members of the church could engage." _Ch. Hist., Vol. I., p. 392. New Work, 1871._