The Standard Manual for Baptist Churches — John Shaqi
The Standard Manual for Baptist ChurchesHiscox, Edward T. (Edward Thurston)
Religion
The Standard Manual for Baptist Churches
Hiscox, Edward T. (Edward Thurston)
Baptists -- Doctrines; Baptists -- Government
DOCTOR DODDRIDGE says: "It is certain that so far as our knowledge of
primitive antiquity reaches, no unbaptized person received the Lord's
Supper." _Lectures, pp. 511, 512._
DOCTOR DICK says: "An uncircumcised man was not permitted to eat the
Passover; and an unbaptized man should not be permitted to partake of
the Eucharist." _Theol., Vol. II., p. 220._
DOCTOR BAXTER says: "What man dares go in a way which hath neither
precept nor example to warrant it, from a way that hath full current of
both? Yet they that will admit members into the visible church without
baptism do so." _Plain Scripture Proof, p. 24._
DOCTOR DWIGHT, President of Yale College, and author of "Systematic
Theology," says: "It is an indispensable qualification for this
ordinance that the candidate for communion be a member of the visible
church in full standing. By this, I intend that he should be a man of
piety; that he should have made a public profession of religion, and
that he should have been baptized." _Syst. Theol., Ser. 160, B. 8, Ch.
4. Sec. 7._
DOCTOR GRIFFIN, one of the fathers of New England Congregationalism,
says: "I agree with the advocates of close communion on two points:
1. That baptism is the initiatory ordinance which introduces us into
the visible church; of course, where there is no baptism, there are no
visible churches. 2. That we ought not to commune with those who are
not baptized, and of course not church-members, even if we regard them
as Christians." _Letter on Baptism, 1829, cited by Curtis on Com., p.
125._
DOCTOR HIBBARD, a leading Methodist scholar and Divine, says: "In one
principle Baptist and Pedobaptist churches agree. They both agree in
rejecting from communion at the table of the Lord, and in denying the
rights of church fellowship to all who have not been baptized." And
with admirable frankness, he adds: "The charge of _close communion_ is
no more applicable to the Baptist than to us [Pedobaptists]; insomuch
as the question of church fellowship with them is determined by as
liberal principles as it is with any other Protestant churches, so far,
I mean, as the present subject is concerned--i.e., _it is determined by
valid baptism._" _Hibbard on Christ. Bap., P. II., p. 174._
DOCTOR BULLOCK, another Methodist Divine, says: "Close communion, as it
is generally termed, is the only logical and consistent course for
Baptist churches to pursue. If their premises are right, their
conclusion is surely just as it should be." And he commends the
firmness of Baptists in not inviting to the communion those whom they
regard as unbaptized. He says: "They do not feel willing to countenance
such laxity in Christian discipline. Let us honor them for their
steadfastness in maintaining what they believe to be a Bible precept,
rather than criticize and censure because they differ with us
concerning the intent and mode of Christian baptism, and believe it to
be an irrepealable condition of coming to the Lord's Table." _What
Christians Believe._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account