The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education — John Shaqi
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
The most important advantage which we derive from the use of two
eyes is to enable us to _see distance_, or a third dimension in
space. That we have this power has been denied by Dr. Berkeley, and
many distinguished philosophers, who maintain that our perception of
distance is acquired by experience, by means of the criteria already
mentioned. This is undoubtedly true for great distances, but we
shall presently see, from the effects of the stereoscope, that the
successive convergency of the optic axes upon two points of an object
at different distances, exhibits to us the difference of distance when
we have no other possible means of perceiving it. If, for example, we
suppose G, D, Fig. 7, to be separate points, or parts of an object,
whose distances are GO, DO, then if we converge the optical axes HG,
H′ G upon G, and next turn them upon D, the points will appear to be
situated at G and D at the distance GD from each other, and at the
distances OG, OD from the observer, although there is nothing whatever
in the appearance of the points, or in the lights and shades of the
object, to indicate distance. That this vision of distance is not
the result of experience is obvious from the fact that distance is
seen as perfectly by children as by adults; and it has been proved
by naturalists that animals newly born appreciate distances with the
greatest correctness. We shall afterwards see that so infallible is
our vision of near distances, that a body whose real distance we can
ascertain by placing both our hands upon it, will appear at the greater
or less distance at which it is placed by the convergency of the
optical axes.
We are now prepared to understand generally, how, in binocular vision,
we see the difference between a picture and a statue, and between a
real landscape and its representation. When we look at a picture of
which every part is nearly at the same distance from the eyes, the
point of convergence of the optical axes is nearly at the same distance
from the eyes; but when we look at its original, whether it be a
living man, a statue, or a landscape, the optical axes are converged
in rapid succession upon the nose, the eyes, and the ears, or upon
objects in the foreground, the middle and the remote distances in the
landscape, and the relative distances of all these points from the eye
are instantly perceived. The _binocular relief_ thus seen is greatly
superior to the _monocular relief_ already described.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account