The Study of Astronomy, adapted to the capacities of youth: In twelve familiar dialogues, between a tutor and his pupil: explaining the general phænomena of the heavenly bodies, the theory of the tides, &c.Stedman, John, teacher of astronomy
Science
The Study of Astronomy, adapted to the capacities of youth: In twelve familiar dialogues, between a tutor and his pupil: explaining the general phænomena of the heavenly bodies, the theory of the tides, &c.
Stedman, John, teacher of astronomy
Astronomy -- Juvenile literature -- Early works to 1800
TUTOR. If one boat were three times the bulk of the other, how then?
PUPIL. The lightest would move three times as far as the heaviest, or 15
yards whilst the heaviest moved only 5.
TUTOR. Upon my word you reason philosophically. In both cases you are
perfectly right.
PUPIL. As the sun is so immense a body that his quantity of matter is so
much greater than the planets, I am at a loss to know why they are not
by the power of attraction drawn to him.
TUTOR. And so they would if the attractive power were not counteracted
by another of equal force.
PUPIL. Did you not say, Sir, that the planets are kept in their orbits
by attraction?
TUTOR. I did. But you find that by attraction _only_ the sun would draw
all the planets to himself.
PUPIL. That is evident. But I wish to know what this counteracting power
you speak of is?
TUTOR. I will tell you presently.—You must remember that _simple_ motion
is naturally rectilineal, that is, all bodies, if there were nothing to
prevent them, would move in strait lines.
PUPIL. Then as the planetary motion is circular, it cannot be simple?
TUTOR. No. It is a _compound_ of the two forces I have been mentioning:
the one is called the attractive or centripetal force; the other, the
projectile or centrifugal force.
PUPIL. The former I clearly comprehend, but not the latter. I can
conceive, that if two bodies approach each other by attraction they must
move in a right line.
TUTOR. If you shoot a marble on a smooth piece of ice, in what direction
will it run?
PUPIL. Strait forward.
TUTOR. This is a projectile force.—Could you, do you think, shoot it in
any other direction?
PUPIL. No, Sir.
TUTOR. Then is not this motion also rectilineal?
PUPIL. It is.
TUTOR. When you strike a ball with your cricket-bat, or throw a stone
with your hand, is it not projected or thrown forward by the force of
the bat or hand?
PUPIL. Certainly.
TUTOR. And does it not move in a strait line?
PUPIL. At first it appears to do so; but afterwards it inclines towards
and falls to the earth.
TUTOR. Cannot you account for this?
PUPIL. I suppose it must be drawn to the earth by attraction.
TUTOR. You are right. The attraction of the earth, and the resistance of
the atmosphere or air through which it moves, retards its progress, or
it would continue moving in a strait line, with a velocity equal to that
which was at first impressed upon it. In like manner the beneficent
Creator of the Universe impressed a force on all the planets which
should be equal to that of the attractive power of the sun, that one
might not overcome the other.
PUPIL. This wants explaining.
TUTOR. I would willingly gratify you, but as I have much more to say on
the subject, I fear it will be too great a burthen on your memory; it
will therefore be better to postpone it.
PUPIL. As you please, Sir.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIALOGUE VII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account