The Two Spies: Nathan Hale and John AndréLossing, Benson John
History
The Two Spies: Nathan Hale and John André
Lossing, Benson John
André, John, 1751-1780; Hale, Nathan, 1755-1776
Arnold promptly asked Congress to investigate the charges. He regarded
this report of the committee as a vindication of his character; but
he immediately urged Congress to act speedily upon the report.
Instead of doing so, the report was referred to a joint committee
of Congress and the Executive Council of Pennsylvania. They passed
a resolution to refer some of the charges to a court-martial, to be
appointed by Washington. When the charges were so referred, Arnold was
indignant, but was compelled to submit. He urged prompt action, but a
court-martial to try him was not convened until December following.
They gave their decision on the 26th of January, 1780. The accused was
acquitted of several of the charges, and of "all intentional wrong"
in the whole matter of the other charges; but it was decided that,
for "imprudent and improper conduct," he should be reprimanded by
the commander-in-chief. This was done in the most delicate manner by
Washington; but, as it implied a stigma upon his character, Arnold
was exceedingly indignant. This act doubtless stimulated him in his
treasonable undertaking, in which he appears to have been already
engaged for fully nine months. Dr. Sparks says: "He [Arnold] had
already made secret advances to the enemy under a feigned name,
intending to square his conduct according to circumstances; and
prepared, if the court decided against him, to seek revenge at any
hazard."
There appears to be clear evidence that overtures were first made by
the other side, probably by Beverly Robinson,[25] to whom is attributed
a letter given by Marbois, who was attached to the French legation at
Philadelphia.[26] Be that as it may, it is known that correspondence
between General Arnold and Sir Henry Clinton began so early as the
spring of 1779. Arnold wrote in a disguised hand, and under the
assumed name of "Gustavus." The tenor of the correspondence was of a
commercial character, so as to mislead others.
After the exchange of two or three letters, and with the impression
that "Gustavus" was an officer of high rank in the American army,
Clinton committed the task of carrying on the correspondence to Major
André, who wrote over the signature of "John Anderson," in a slightly
disguised hand. Not doubting that "Gustavus" was General Arnold, André
probably wrote the letter to Mrs. Arnold in August for the purpose of
making clear to her husband the name and character of "John Anderson"
by means of his handwriting:
[Illustration:
I am in behalf of Mi'm ---- and Co.
Sin your Obed. Hble Servant
Mr. John Anderson
Merchant Gustavus
Fac-simile of Arnold's Disguised Handwriting.]
[Illustration:
Let me entreat you Sir to favour a matter interesting to the parties
concerned.
John Anderson
Fac-simile of André's Disguised Handwriting.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account