The Wigmaker in Eighteenth-Century Williamsburg: An Account of His Barbering, Hair-dressing, & Peruke-Making Services, & Some Remarks on Wigs of Various Styles.Bullock, Thomas K.
History
The Wigmaker in Eighteenth-Century Williamsburg: An Account of His Barbering, Hair-dressing, & Peruke-Making Services, & Some Remarks on Wigs of Various Styles.
Bullock, Thomas K.
Wigmakers; Wigs -- History
[Illustration: _Some of the tools and equipment of the
barber-wigmaker, especially those used for shaving and hair
dressing. Note in particular the powdering masks in the lower right
corner that covered the faces of customers while their hair or wigs
were being dusted with powder._ DIDEROT]
And an anonymous traveler of the 1740s observed that in Maryland:
’Tis an odd Sight, that except some of the very elevated Sort, few
Persons wear Perukes, so that you would imagine they were all sick, or
going to bed: Common People wear Woollen and Yarn Caps; but the better
ones wear white Holland or Cotton: Thus they travel fifty Miles from
Home. It may be cooler, for ought I know; but, methinks, ’tis very
ridiculous.
Perhaps on the frontier men allowed their beards to go unshorn. In the
settled areas and towns, however, only a clean-shaven face was
acceptable to the fashion that simultaneously demanded false hair on the
head. Most men probably shaved themselves, and some, like Councillor
Robert Carter and Dr. John Sequeira, had slaves trained to do their
barbering. Of the rest a goodly number visited Charlton’s shop almost
daily and paid him an annual fee for “shaving and dressing.” We do not
know if this meant shaving the face or the head or both; “dressing,” of
course, normally referred to care of the wig.
Some among Charlton’s regular customers for shaving and dressing,
however, never bought a wig from him. Either they imported their own
directly from a maker like Thomas Clendinning of Glasgow, or else they
wore no wig. To defy fashion in this second manner must have taken some
courage, for the wig was an important badge of social rank, particularly
among the upper and would-be upper classes.
But it was not an infallible one. Negro slaves may sometimes have been
decked out in white wigs: those who were the liveried house slaves,
coachmen, and the like, of the ostentatiously rich planters. On the
other hand, such a well-to-do and fashion-conscious man as George
Washington seems from portraits and other records to have worn no wig at
all, though he kept his own hair well powdered and curled. In the lesser
ranks craftsmen, indentured servants, and apprentices sometimes did and
sometimes did not wear wigs.
Washington, who often lodged when in Williamsburg at the tavern of
Richard Charlton, was not among Edward Charlton’s customers for any
barbering service. Peyton Randolph, however, the speaker of the House of
Burgesses, was an excellent patron. He bought two brown dress bob wigs
every year, and each December paid for a year’s shaving and dressing.
John Randolph, the attorney general, was another regular customer, who
paid nothing for several years, then settled his large bill partly in
“cash,” partly by “the pardon of a Negro,” and partly with some horses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account