The Works of William Shakespeare [Cambridge Edition] [Vol. 7 of 9] — John Shaqi
The Works of William Shakespeare [Cambridge Edition] [Vol. 7 of 9]Shakespeare, William
General
The Works of William Shakespeare [Cambridge Edition] [Vol. 7 of 9]
Shakespeare, William
English drama
THE | MOST EX-CELLENT AND | Lamentable Tragedie, of | _Romeo_
_and Juliet_. | As it hath beene sundrie times publiquely
Acted, | by the KINGS Maiesties Seruants | at the Globe. |
Newly corrected, augmented, and | amended: | LONDON | Printed
for IOHN SMETHVVICK, and are to be sold | at his Shop in Saint
_Dunstanes_ Church-yard, | in Fleetestreete vnder the Dyall |
1609 |.
It was printed from Q2, from which it differs by a few corrections, and
more frequently by additional errors.
The next Quarto has no date.
Its title-page bears for the first time the name of the author. After
the word 'GLOBE' and in a separate line we find the words: 'Written by
W. _Shake-speare_.' Otherwise, except in some slight variations of type
and spelling, the title-page of the undated Quarto does not differ from
that of Q3. It was also printed '_for Iohn Smethwicke_,' without the
mention of the printer's name.
Though this edition has no date, internal evidence conclusively proves
that it was printed from Q3 and that the Quarto of 1637 was printed
from it. We therefore call it Q4.
It contains some very important corrections of the text, none however
that an intelligent reader might not make conjecturally and without
reference to any other authority. Indeed had the corrector been able to
refer to any such authority, he would not have left so many obviously
corrupt passages untouched.
The title-page of the fifth Quarto, our Q5, is substantially identical
with that of Q4, except that it is said to be printed 'by _R. Young_
for _John Smethwicke_,' and dated, 1637.
It is printed, as we have said, from Q4. The punctuation has been
carefully regulated throughout, and the spelling in many cases made
uniform.
The symbol Qq signifies the agreement of Q2, Q3, Q4, and Q5.
The text of the first Folio is taken from that of the third Quarto. As
usual there are a number of changes, some accidental, some deliberate,
but all generally for the worse, excepting the changes in punctuation
and in the stage-directions. The punctuation, as a rule, is more
correct, and the stage-directions are more complete, in the Folio.
The text of the second Folio is printed of course from the first. In
this play there are found in it a considerable number of conjectural
emendations, not generally happy, and perhaps more than the usual
number of errors.
A careful study of the text of _Romeo and Juliet_ will show how little
we can rely upon having the true text, as Shakespeare wrote it, in
those plays for which the Folio is our earliest authority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account