American wit and humor; Evolution (Biology) -- Wit and humor
Soon each pair was quarreling. They usually made up, pretty
soon, and started loving again. But it petered out; each time
more quickly.
Meanwhile the two families had become interested in watching each
other. When Jill had repulsed Jack, and he had moped about it
awhile, he would begin staring at Arabella, over opposite, and
trying to attract her attention. This got Jack in trouble all
around. Arabella indignantly made faces at him and then turned
her back; and as for Jill, she grew furious, and tore out his fur.
But in the next stage, they even stopped hating each other. Each
pair grew indifferent.
Then the doctor put Jack in with Arabella, and Archer with Jill.
Arabella promptly yielded to Jack. New devotion. More transports.
Jill and Archer were shocked. Jill clung to the bars of her
cage, quivering, and screaming remonstrance; and even blase Archer
chattered angrily at some of the scenes. Then the doctor hung
curtains between the cages to shut out the view. Jill and Archer,
left to each other, grew interested. They soon were inseparable.
The four monkeys, thus re-distributed, were now happy once more, and
full of new liveliness and spirit. But before very long, each pair
quarreled--and made up--and quarreled--and then grew indifferent, and
had cynical thoughts about life.
At this point, the doctor put them back with their original mates.
And--they met with a rush! Gave cries of recognition and joy,
like faithful souls re-united. And when they were tired, they
affectionately curled up together; and hugged each other even at
mealtime, and exchanged bits of food.
This was as far as the doctor had gotten, at the time that I met
him; and as I have lost touch with him since, I don't know how
things were afterward. His theory at the time was, that variety
was good for fidelity.
"So how can _we_ help being that way? It's in the blood," he
concluded. "Some creatures, such as wolves, are more serious;
or perhaps more cold-blooded. Never mate but once. Well--we're
not wolves. We can't make wolves our models. If we want to know
how to behave, according to the way nature made us, if we want to
know what is good for our instincts, we must study the monkeys."
To be sure, these particular monkeys were living in idleness.
This corresponds to living in high social circles with us, where
men do not have to work, and lack some of the common incentives to
home-building. The experiment was not conclusive.
Still, even in low social circles--
XIII
Are we or are we not simians? It is no use for any man to try to
think anything else out until he has decided first of all where he
stands on that question. It is not only in love affairs: let us
lay all that aside for the moment. It is in ethics, economics,
art, education, philosophy, what-not. If we are fallen angels,
we should go this road: if we are super-apes, that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account