Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Q. Did you advise him to do so or how did it come about? There had to be
some special reason, since you were both opponents of this political
party.
A. That was the first time, aside from 1923, when the NSDAP was talked
about, and it was useful to know what was going on in this growing
machine—were there any people of good will within the machine, what
were the leaders doing, what plans were being made, what organization
was being set up.
Q. Then first of all you wanted to find out what intentions the NSDAP
had?
A. Yes, and specifically in the youth work, because that had to be the
most important in the long run.
Q. Now, in 1931 Sievers resigned from the NSDAP again; did he do that
with your knowledge?
A. Yes.
Q. On your orders?
A. Yes, one might say that. We discussed it, and I considered it the
thing to do.
Q. Now, why should he suddenly leave the Party since he had been sent
into the Party with the definite purpose of getting information?
A. He had found out what he was to find out, the nature and the make-up,
especially of the youth organization. It was just as inferior as we had
thought, and even at that time it was so corrupt that without any
further plan—and we had no plan at the time—without any further plan
it was not necessary to have him continue.
Q. Now, in the year 1933, Sievers, as the Tribunal has already been
told, again joined the NSDAP; was this also done on your behalf?
A. Yes. At that time we were already a thoroughly organized
organization. We were already asking for volunteers, who were willing
and who were capable of working up in the sense of the Trojan Horse.
Sievers seemed suitable, and he was willing.
Q. Were you able to get him any position within the Party?
A. No. I was not able to help him to obtain any position, and in the
second place I had no intention of telling the individual persons whom I
trusted, in detail, what they were to do.
Q. Then it was up to the skill of the individual to get into a position
from which he would be able to carry out the assignment which you gave
him?
A. Yes.
Q. And how did Sievers obtain this position?
A. He got into this with Hermann Wirth in the Ahnenerbe.
Q. Who was Hermann Wirth?
A. Hermann Wirth was a rather crazy student of pre-history, who had
excellent material and terrible concepts.
Q. Was Wirth already in contact with the Ahnenerbe at that time?
A. As far as I know he was one of the founders.
Q. Then, as you say, Sievers got in contact with Wirth, and through
Wirth he got into the Ahnenerbe?
A. Yes. He was there from 1935 on as Reich Business Manager.
Q. Now, did you give Sievers any specific assignment in the spirit of
your movement?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account