Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. As soon as it was clear that there was a possibility of exploiting
Himmler’s racial romancing and half-education, the assignment developed
to gain Himmler’s confidence with the aid of the Ahnenerbe and to get as
close to him as possible. We, that is my group, were among the people
who very early recognized the special personal danger of Himmler, and in
the second place from the beginning we had been determined that one day
we would have to overthrow the Party regime by force, and for that
purpose one has to get as close as possible to the most dangerous man.
Q. And what were the duties which Sievers had this time? When he first
belonged to the NSDAP, you said he was to get information about the
intentions of the youth movement of the NSDAP.
A. This time, of course, he had to get as many details as he could from
the office of the Reich Leader SS, and transmit them to us. We had to
protect people. We had to build up camouflage positions. We had to help
the other people and in turn to remain unrecognized.
Q. And how did Sievers carry out these duties?
A. Well, it will be best if I begin with myself. I myself was known and
considered undesirable by the Party leadership.
Q. You mean the NSDAP?
A. Well, yes, of course. The Party leaders knew me and considered me
undesirable. I had already been under arrest and had had my house
searched. I was watched by the Gestapo, and in order to build up my
organization I needed to be able to travel anywhere without arousing
suspicion. Consequently, Sievers gave me a fake research assignment,
which was to study Indo-Germanic culture, customs of the annual
festivals.
Q. Sievers said during direct examination that he himself could not
issue any research assignments; you said that you received a fake
research assignment from him; wasn’t this research assignment actually
issued by the curator, Professor Wuest?
A. Yes. If things were going well, and Wuest was in a good mood, or had
been drinking with Sievers, it was possible to persuade him to do
something, and so he succeeded in persuading Wuest that I was efficient
for this research assignment, and so I was given this assignment. And
what concerned Indo-Germanic customs could be found anywhere. I was
given a false pass as a section chief, though I was not a section chief,
and was not a member of the SS nor the Ahnenerbe.
Q. And with this pass you were able easily to get visas to go abroad?
A. Not necessarily. I needed a little more for that purpose, but it was
easier.
Q. Then the actual purpose of this fake research assignment was that
you, who were a suspect, might appear in a more harmless light and would
be able to move rather freely and without supervision?
A. Yes.
* * * * *
Q. What did Sievers do in order to further the activities of your
organization?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account