Hugo, Victor, 1802-1885 -- Criticism and interpretation
There are not, even in the whole work of Victor Hugo, many pages of
deeper and more pathetic interest than those which explain to us "what
exile is." Each of the three prefaces to the three volumes of his _Actes
et Paroles_ is rich in living eloquence, in splendid epigram and
description, narrative and satire and study of men and things: but the
second, it seems to me, would still be first in attraction, if it had no
other claim than this, that it contains the record of the death of
Captain Harvey. No reverence for innocent and heroic suffering, no
abhorrence of triumphant and execrable crime, can impede or interfere
with our sense of the incalculable profit, the measureless addition to
his glory and our gain, resulting from Victor Hugo's exile of nineteen
years and nine months. Greater already than all other poets of his time
together, these years were to make him greater than any but the very
greatest of all time. His first task was of course the discharge of a
direct and practical duty; the record or registration of the events he
had just witnessed, the infliction on the principal agent in them of the
simple and immediate chastisement consisting in the delineation of his
character and the recapitulation of his work. There would seem to be
among modern Englishmen an impression--somewhat singular, it appears to
me, in a race which professes to hold in special reverence a book so
dependent for its arguments and its effects on a continuous appeal to
conscience and emotion as the Bible--that the presence of passion, be it
never so righteous, so rational, so inevitable by any one not ignoble or
insane, implies the absence of reason; that such indignation as inflamed
the lips of Elijah with prophecy, and armed the hand of Jesus with a
scourge, is a sign--except of course in Palestine of old--that the
person affected by this kind of moral excitement must needs be a lunatic
of the sentimental if not rather of the criminal type. The main facts
recorded in the pages of _Napoléon le Petit_ and _L'Histoire d'un
Crime_ are simple, flagrant, palpable, indisputable. The man who takes
any other view of them than is expressed in these two books must be
prepared to impugn and to confute the principle that perjury, robbery,
and murder are crimes. But, we are told, the perpetual vehemence of
incessant imprecation, the stormy insistence of unremitting obloquy,
which accompanies every chapter, illuminates every page, underlines
every sentence of the narrative, must needs impair the confidence of an
impartial reader in the trustworthiness of a chronicle and a commentary
written throughout as in characters of flaming fire. Englishmen are
proud to prefer a more temperate, a more practical, a more sedate form
of political or controversial eloquence. When I remember and consider
certain examples of popular oratory and controversy now flagrant and
flourishing among us, I am tempted to doubt the exact accuracy of this
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account