Visits to Fields of Battle, in England, of the Fifteenth Century: to which are added, some miscellaneous tracts and papers upon archæological subjectsBrooke, Richard
History
Visits to Fields of Battle, in England, of the Fifteenth Century: to which are added, some miscellaneous tracts and papers upon archæological subjects
Brooke, Richard
Battlefields -- England; Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
On the 9th {44b} of July, 1460, the Earls of Warwick and March,
accompanied by Viscount Bourchier, Lord Falconberg, and others, advanced
with their forces, and the battle commenced about seven o’clock in the
morning. According to one account, their van was led by the Earl of
Warwick, and after him followed the Earl of March, with the banner of his
father; others state that the Earl of March commanded the van, the Earl
of Warwick the middle, and Lord Falconberg the rear body. During the
battle, Edmund Lord Grey, of Ruthen, {45a} who was in the Lancastrian
army, betrayed his trust, and, having a command in a part of the King’s
camp, where, in consequence of a deep trench, and of a rampart, fortified
with piles and sharp stakes, with which the camp was encompassed, so that
the Yorkists could not enter without great danger, he and his men
assisted the Yorkists to get within the intrenchments, and greatly
conduced to the defeat of the Lancastrians. {45b}
Another circumstance occurred which was a great disadvantage to the
Lancastrians: there was a considerable fall of rain on that day, and the
cannons, with which the camp of the King was in some degree at least,
defended, were prevented by the wet, from being of the service that they
otherwise might have been. {45c}
The battle however lasted some time, with obstinacy and fierceness, the
victory being uncertain until nine o’clock, when the King’s army was
completely defeated. Many of his forces were slain in the battle and in
their flight towards the town, and great numbers were drowned in the
river Nen; {46a} for, as before observed, it was in their rear, and
consequently between them and Northampton, and it proved a most serious
disadvantage to the fugitives, when flying towards the town; so that the
Lancastrians felt, to their grievous loss, the impolicy of taking up a
position with the river in their rear. The King was left to his fate by
the vanquished, and was speedily captured by the victors. {46b}
Amongst other persons of distinction on the Lancastrian side, slain in
the battle, were the Duke of Buckingham, the Earl of Shrewsbury, {46c}
his brother Sir Christopher Talbot, Viscount Beaumont, {46d} Lord
Egremont, {46e} and Sir William Lucy, who hastened to take a part in the
fight, and immediately on joining in it, received his death wound, by a
blow on the head, with an axe. A considerable slaughter amongst persons
of distinction, is said to have been caused by the Yorkist leaders
directing their men to spare the common soldiers, but to despatch the
noblemen, knights, and gentlemen. Many of the Lancastrians, however,
were taken prisoners, in consequence of their having alighted from their
horses, to fight on foot; a mode of fighting very likely to be adopted,
when it is borne in mind that they were to fight behind intrenchments.
The Duke of Somerset and others narrowly escaped, and fled with Queen
Margaret, and Edward Prince of Wales, {47a} into the bishopric of Durham.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account