Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notesLoftie, W. J. (William John)
History
Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notes
Loftie, W. J. (William John)
Architecture -- England -- London; Whitehall (London, England) -- History
Again, De Bordeaux writes a few weeks afterwards:—“Some say he will
assume the title and prerogatives of a Roman emperor. In order to
strengthen his party, he deals out promises to all parties. It is
here, however, as everywhere else; no government was or is right in
the people’s eyes, and Cromwell, once their idol, is now the object of
their blame, perhaps their hate.”
There is a record of May Day in the same year, 1654. The writer is much
shocked at the licence that prevailed. There was “much sin committed by
wicked meetings, with fiddlers, drunkenness, ribaldry, and the like.”
Cromwell kept open house at Whitehall on Mondays. In 1657, the Speaker
announced to the House of Commons that the Lord Protector invited the
whole House to dinner in the Banqueting House, and he had similarly
received them the year before.
Cromwell’s last illness seized him at Hampton Court. He was removed
to Whitehall. There, while a tremendous tempest howled round the old
walls, he breathed his last on the afternoon of the 3rd of September,
1658. The concourse of fanatical preachers which disturbed his last
moments seems to have been doubled at his death, and Tillotson, the
future Archbishop, describes Richard Cromwell as seated at one side of
a table with six divines at the other. Cromwell’s funeral took place
from Somerset House, not from Whitehall, so it does not specially
concern us. Suffice it to say here, that no king or queen has ever been
interred at so much cost or so magnificently.
There is little except Tillotson’s note quoted above to connect
Richard Cromwell with Whitehall; but a meeting of discontented
officers which he permitted at Wallingford House, over the way,
precipitated his fall. It has always been asserted, apparently with
truth, that Oliver’s wife had been inclined to Royalism, and that she
pressed her husband to bring in the late King’s son. This did not,
however, prevent her from an endeavour to secure some of the royal
effects at Whitehall, when she, in her turn, received notice to quit.
Early in 1660 they were taken possession of by a Commission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account