Wit and its relation to the unconsciousFreud, Sigmund
Science
Wit and its relation to the unconscious
Freud, Sigmund
Subconsciousness; Wit and humor -- Psychological aspects
“_It is almost impossible to carry the torch of truth through a crowd
without singeing somebody’s beard._” This may seem witty, but on closer
examination one notices that the witty effect does not come from the
comparison itself but from a secondary attribute of the same. For the
expression “the torch of truth” is no new comparison, but one which has
been used for a long time and which has degenerated into a fixed phrase,
as always happens when a comparison has the luck to be absorbed into the
common usage of speech. But whereas we hardly notice the comparison in
the saying, “the torch of truth,” its original full force is restored it
by Lichtenberg, since by building further on the comparison it results
in a deduction. But the taking of blurred expressions in their full
sense is already known to us as a technique of wit; it finds a place
with the Manifold Application of the Same Material (p. 35). It may well
be that the witty impression created by Lichtenberg’s sentence is due
only to its relation to this technique of wit.
The same explanation will undoubtedly hold good for another witty
comparison by the same author.
“_The man was not exactly a shining light, but a great candlestick....
He was a professor of philosophy._”
To call a scholar a shining light, a “_lumen mundi_,” has long ceased to
be an effective comparison, whether it be originally qualified as a
witticism or not. But here the comparison was freshened up and its full
force was restored to it by deducting a modification from it and in this
way setting up a second and new comparison. The way in which the second
comparison came into existence seems to contain the condition of the
witticism and not the two comparisons themselves. This would then be a
case of Identical Wit-Technique as in the example of the torch.
The following comparison seems witty on other but similarly classifiable
grounds: “_I look upon reviews as a kind of children’s disease_ which
more or less attacks new-born books. There are cases on record where the
healthiest died of it, and the puniest have often lived through it. Many
do not get it at all. Attempts have frequently been made to prevent the
disease by means of _amulets of prefaces and dedications, or to color
them up by personal pronunciamentos; but it does not always help_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account