Feminism in Greek Literature from Homer to Aristotle — Aristotle — John Shaqi
Feminism in Greek Literature from Homer to Aristotle
Aristotle · en
But when a woman left her husband’s house and went abroad, she had to don
the symbol of her slavery, the ‘kredemnon.’ This article was a kind of
yashmak-veil, drawn across the face to protect a woman from the gaze of
strange men, not her lawful owners. It gave its wearer the white cheeks
of the odalisque, and shut her off from the freedom of the outside world.
It was, like our cap and apron, the badge of servitude, and to escape
from it the only way was to become a slave indeed, for the slave-woman
alone could walk abroad with open face.
This is what Euripides means when he makes the captive Andromache sob:
‘And I, even I, was dragged from my royal bower down to the sea-beach
with nothing about my head save hideous slavery.’ (_And._ 109.)
And so Hecuba, in the _Trojan Women_, a slave bare-footed and
bare-headed, crouches on the ground to escape from the gaze of men, and
cries: ‘Guide me to my bed of straw and to the stones which now will
hide my face.’ (_Trojan Women_, 508.) Slavery in ancient times was a
hard fate, but for many an Athenian woman it could have had but little
terror. A wife was already the property of her husband, and slaves and
women are commonly classed together.
The Athenian, however, with all his faults was a genuine lover of
freedom, and did not care for slaves. Neither his wife nor the
flute-girls, whose charms could be bought by any bidder, could really
satisfy him, strange mixture that he was of sensuality and intellect.
The only women whose company he desired were those called, half in jest,
half in earnest, the Hetairai, ‘the close companions,’ the same word
being used for those political associations which formed the closest link
between man and man.
The Hetairai were foreign women, and stood outside the law: they were not
Athenian citizens, and so had no privileges; but, on the other hand, they
were not under restraint. Often highly educated, it was their business to
take part in all men’s interests: they were their own mistresses, engaged
freely in the political life of Athens, and in many cases exercised very
great influence even in affairs of state. To their personal attractions
they added social charm and a long training in the arts of pleasure, and
the contrast between them and the Athenian wives may be illustrated if we
compare the life of an actress of the _Comédie Française_ with that of an
inmate of a Turkish harem. The French actress and the Japanese geisha
are the nearest modern parallels to the Greek hetaira, and all three owe
their existence as a class to much the same social conditions, a high
standard of culture and intelligence, a low standard of sexual morality.