{ Seeing. { Hearing. { Primary { Smelling. { { Tasting. { Perception { { Touching. { by Sense { { { { Imagination. { { Secondary { Affection { pleasant. Quality { { { unpleasant. { { By Seeing, as Light and Colour. { { By Hearing, as Sound. { Sensible { By Smelling, as Odours. { Quality { By Tasting, as Savours. { By Touching, as Hardness, Heat, { Cold, &c. THE FORM OF THE PREDICAMENT OF RELATION. { Magnitudes, as Equality and Inequality. { Qualities, as Likeness and Unlikeness. Relation of { { Together { In Place. { { { In Time. { Order { { { In Place { Former. { Not together { { Later { In Time { Former. { Later [Sidenote: Some things to be noted concerning predicaments.] 16. Concerning which predicaments it is to be noted, in the first place, that as the division is made in the first predicament into contradictory names, so it might have been done in the rest. For, as there, _body_ is divided into _animated_ and _not-animated_, so, in the second predicament, _continual quantity_ may be divided into _line_ and _not-line_, and again, _not-line_ into _superficies_ and _not-superficies_, and so in the rest; but it was not necessary. Secondly, it is to be observed, that of _positive_ names the former comprehends the latter; but of _negatives_ the former is comprehended by the latter. For example, _living-creature_ is the name of every man, and therefore it comprehends the name _man_; but, on the contrary, _not-man_ is the name of everything which is not-living-creature, and therefore the name _not-living-creature_, which is put first, is comprehended by the latter name, _not-man_. Thirdly, we must take heed that we do not think, that as names, so the diversities of things themselves may be searched out and determined by such distinctions as these; or that arguments may be taken from hence (as some have done ridiculously) to prove that the kinds of things are not infinite.