The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 03 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 03 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
Nor does it alter the case of honour, whether an action, so it be great
and difficult, and consequently a sign of much power, be just or unjust:
for honour consisteth only in the opinion of power. Therefore the
ancient heathen did not think they dishonoured, but greatly honoured the
Gods, when they introduced them in their poems, committing rapes,
thefts, and other great, but unjust, or unclean acts: insomuch as
nothing is so much celebrated in Jupiter, as his adulteries; nor in
Mercury, as his frauds, and thefts: of whose praises, in a hymn of
Homer, the greatest is this, that being born in the morning, he had
invented music at noon, and before night, stolen away the cattle of
Apollo, from his herdsmen.
Also amongst men, till there were constituted great commonwealths, it
was thought no dishonour to be a pirate, or a highway thief; but rather
a lawful trade, not only amongst the Greeks, but also amongst all other
nations; as is manifest by the histories of ancient time. And at this
day, in this part of the world, private duels are, and always will be
honourable, though unlawful, till such time as there shall be honour
ordained for them that refuse, and ignominy for them that make the
challenge. For duels also are many times effects of courage; and the
ground of courage is always strength or skill, which are power; though
for the most part they be effects of rash speaking, and of the fear of
dishonour, in one, or both the combatants; who engaged by rashness, are
driven into the lists to avoid disgrace.
[Sidenote: Coats of arms.]
Scutcheons, and coats of arms hereditary, where they have any eminent
privileges, are honourable; otherwise not: for their power consisteth
either in such privileges, or in riches, or some such thing as is
equally honoured in other men. This kind of honour, commonly called
gentry, hath been derived from the ancient Germans. For there never was
any such thing known, where the German customs were unknown. Nor is it
now any where in use, where the Germans have not inhabited. The ancient
Greek commanders, when they went to war, had their shields painted with
such devices as they pleased; insomuch as an unpainted buckler was a
sign of poverty, and of a common soldier; but they transmitted not the
inheritance of them. The Romans transmitted the marks of their families:
but they were the images, not the devices of their ancestors. Amongst
the people of Asia, Africa, and America, there is not, nor was ever, any
such thing. The Germans only had that custom; from whom it has been
derived into England, France, Spain, and Italy, when in great numbers
they either aided the Romans, or made their own conquests in these
western parts of the world.