The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
tutors, but is imprinted in our hearts by nature; we need not turn over
any obscure books to find out this truth. The poets chaunt it in the
theatres, the shepherds in the mountains, the pastors teach it in their
churches, the doctors in the universities, the common people in the
markets, and all mankind in the whole world do assent unto it, except an
handful of men who have poisoned their intellectuals with paradoxical
principles. Fourthly, this necessity which T. H. hath devised, which is
grounded upon the necessitation of a man’s will without his will, is the
worst of all others, and is so far from lessening those difficulties and
absurdities which flow from the fatal destiny of the Stoics, that it
increaseth them, and rendereth them unanswerable. (_g_) No man blameth
fire for burning whole cities; no man taxeth poison for destroying men;
but those persons who apply them to such wicked ends. If the will of man
be not in his own disposition, he is no more a free agent than the fire
or the poison. Three things are required to make an act or omission
culpable. First, that it be in our power to perform it or forbear it;
secondly, that we be obliged to perform it, or forbear it, respectively;
thirdly, that we omit that which we ought to have done, or do that which
we ought to have omitted. (_h_) No man sins in doing those things which
he could not shun, or forbearing those things which never were in his
power. T. H. may say, that besides the power, men have also an appetite
to evil objects, which renders them culpable. It is true; but if this
appetite be determined by another, not by themselves, or if they have
not the use of reason to curb or restrain their appetites, they sin no
more than a stone descending downward, according to its natural
appetite, or the brute beasts who commit voluntary errors in following
their sensitive appetites, yet sin not.
(_i_) The question then is not whether a man be necessitated to will or
nill, yet free to act or forbear. But saving the ambiguous acception of
the word _free_, the question is plainly this, whether all agents, and
all events natural, civil, moral, (for we speak not now of the
conversion of a sinner, that concerns not this question), be
predetermined extrinsically and inevitably without their own concurrence
in the determination; so as all actions and events which either are or
shall be, cannot but be, nor can be otherwise, after any other manner,
or in any other place, time, number, measure, order, nor to any other
end, than they are. And all this in respect of the supreme cause, or a
concourse of extrinsical causes determining them to one.