The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
you with proof enough, that horses, dogs, and other brute beasts, do
demur oftentimes upon the way they are to take: the horse, retiring from
some strange figure he sees, and coming on again to avoid the spur. And
what else doth man that deliberateth, but one while proceed toward
action, another while retire from it, as the hope of greater good draws
him, or the fear of greater evil drives him? A child may be so young as
to do all which it does without all deliberation, but that is but till
it chance to be hurt by doing somewhat, or till it be of age to
understand the rod; for the actions wherein he hath once a check, shall
be deliberated on a second time. Fools and madmen manifestly deliberate
no less than the wisest men, though they make not so good a choice, the
images of things being by diseases altered. For bees and spiders, if he
had so little to do as to be a spectator of their actions, he would have
confessed not only election, but also art, prudence, and policy in them,
very near equal to that of mankind. Of bees Aristotle says, their life
is civil. He is deceived, if he think any spontaneous action, after once
being checked in it, differs from an action voluntary and elective, for
even the setting of a man’s foot in the posture of walking, and the
action of ordinary eating, was once deliberated, how and when it should
be done; and though it afterwards became easy and habitual, so as to be
done without fore-thought, yet that does not hinder but that the act is
voluntary and proceeds from election. So also are the rashest actions of
choleric persons voluntary and upon deliberation. For who is there, but
very young children, that has not considered when and how far he ought,
or safely may, strike or revile. Seeing then he agrees with me that such
actions are necessitated, and the fancy of those that do them is
determined to the actions they do, it follows out of his own doctrine,
that the liberty of election does not take away the necessity of
electing this or that individual thing. And thus one of his arguments
fights against another.
[Sidenote: The Bishop’s reply.]