The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_J. D._ “We have partly seen before how T. H. hath coined a new kind of
liberty, a new kind of necessity, a new kind of election; and now in
this section a new kind of spontaneity, and a new kind of voluntary
actions. Although he say that here is nothing new to him, yet I begin to
suspect that either here are many things new to him, or otherwise his
election is not the result of a serious mature deliberation. (_a_) The
first thing that I offer, is, how often he mistakes my meaning in this
one section. First, I make voluntary and spontaneous actions to be one
and the same; he saith, I distinguish them, so as spontaneous actions
may be necessary, but voluntary actions cannot. Secondly, (_b_) I
distinguish between free acts and voluntary acts. The former are always
deliberate, the latter may be indeliberate; all free acts are voluntary,
but all voluntary acts are not free. But he saith I confound them and
make them the same. (_c_) Thirdly, he saith, I ascribe spontaneity only
to fools, children, madmen, and beasts; but I acknowledge spontaneity
hath place in rational men, both as it is comprehended in liberty, and
as it is distinguished from liberty.
(_d_) “Yet I have no reason to be offended at it; for he deals no
otherwise with me than he doth with himself. Here he tells us that
‘voluntary presupposeth deliberation.’ But (No. XXV.) he tells us
contrary, ‘that whatsoever followeth the last appetite is voluntary, and
where there is but one appetite, that is the last:’ and that ‘no action
of a man can be said to be without deliberation, though never so
sudden.’ So (No. XXXIII.) he tells us, that ‘by spontaneity is meant
inconsiderate proceeding, or else nothing is meant by it:’ yet here he
tells us, that ‘all voluntary actions which proceed not from fear, are
spontaneous,’ whereof many are deliberate, as that wherein he instanceth
himself, ‘to give money for merchandise.’ Thirdly, when I said that
children, before they have the use of reason, act spontaneously, as when
they suck the breast, but do not act freely, because they have not
judgment to deliberate or elect, here T. H. undertakes to prove that
they do deliberate and elect; and yet presently after confesseth again,
that ‘a child may be so young, as to do what it doth without all
deliberation.’