§ 5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction 53 _Second Moment_ of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity 55 § 6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction 55 § 7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic 57 § 8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective 59 § 9. Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object 63 _Third Moment_ of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein 67 § 10. Of purposiveness in general 67 § 11. The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) 69 § 12. The judgement of taste rests on _a priori_ grounds 70 § 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion 72 § 14. Elucidation by means of examples 73 § 15. The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection 77 § 16. The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure 81 § 17. Of the Ideal of Beauty 84 _Fourth Moment_ of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object 91 § 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 91 § 19. The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is conditioned 92 § 20. The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense 92 § 21. Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? 93 § 22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense 94 _General remark_ on the first section of the Analytic 96