§ 49. Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius 197 § 50. Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art 205 § 51. Of the division of the beautiful arts 206 § 52. Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product 214 § 53. Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts 215 § 54. Remark 220 =Second Division.=--Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement 229 § 55. 229 § 56. Representation of the antinomy of Taste 230 § 57. Solution of the antinomy of Taste 231 § 58. Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgement 241 § 59. Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality 248 § 60. =Appendix=:--Of the method of Taste 253 SECOND PART.--CRITIQUE OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT 257 § 61. Of the objective purposiveness of Nature 259 =First Division.=--Analytic of the Teleological Judgement 262 § 62. Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material 262 § 63. Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature 268 § 64. Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes 272 § 65. Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings 275 § 66. Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings 280 § 67. Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes 282 § 68. Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science 287 =Second Division.=--Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement 292 § 69. What is an antinomy of the Judgement? 292 § 70. Representation of this antinomy 293 § 71. Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy 296 § 72. Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of Nature 298 § 73. None of the above systems give what they pretend 302