Celtic art in Pagan and Christian times — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Celtic art in Pagan and Christian times
John Stuart Mill · en
Polybius (B.C. 205-123) gives more definite and satisfactory
information about the Celts than the somewhat vague references made to
them by previous writers. From him we learn[18]
[16] C. Elton’s _Origins of English History_, p. 25.
[17] A. Bertrand and S. Reinach’s _Les Celtes_, p. 19.
[18] _Ibid._, p. 27.
(1) That the Celts of upper Italy did not come from the
Gaul of Cæsar, but from the valley of the Danube, and more
particularly from the countries which border upon the
northern slopes of the Julian Alps of Noricum.
(2) That these peoples were primarily divided into Cisalpine
Celts and Transalpine Celts, that is to say, into the Celts
of the Alps and of the north of the Alps. In the third
century B.C. these latter were already called, more
particularly by Polybius, by the name of Galati.
(3) That the Cisalpine Celts, who from a remote period long
before the fourth century B.C. inhabited the wide
plains of Lombardy from the Alps to the river Pô, were, for
the most part, an agricultural and sedentary race living
in luxury and in a state of civilisation without any doubt
greatly superior to that which could have existed in Gaul at
that time.
(4) That the Galati, on the contrary, the Transalpine Celts,
although kinsmen to the former mountaineers, still half
nomads, shepherds and warriors chiefly, always ready to run
the risk of a raid, armed from the fourth century with an
iron sword, an iron-headed spear and a shield, lived under
the régime of a sort of military aristocracy, as proud as
they were poor, such as the inhabitants of the Caucasus were
not half a century ago.
The people who were called _Celtæ_ by the earlier historians, and
_Galatæ_ by the more recent writers, were also known to the Romans as
_Galli_; but these three separate appellations do not seem to indicate
any difference of race, and indeed they all have the same meaning, viz.
a warrior. The Gauls of Cæsar’s time preferred to call themselves by
the name which he wrote, _Celtæ_.[19]
All the Classical authorities are agreed as to the physical
characteristics of the Celts with whom they were acquainted. The Celts
are invariably described as being tall, muscular men, with a fair skin,
blue eyes, and blonde hair tending towards red.[20] Such were the Gauls
who conquered the Etruscans of northern Italy in B.C. 396, took Rome
under Brennus six years later, sacked Delphi in B.C. 279, and gave
their name to Galatia in Asia Minor.
[19] Prof. J. Rhys’ _Celtic Britain_, p. 2.
[20] C. Elton’s _Origins of English History_, p. 113.