Enfranchisement of women : $b Reprinted from the Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, for July 1851 — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Enfranchisement of women : $b Reprinted from the Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, for July 1851
John Stuart Mill · en
There is hardly any situation more unfavorable to the maintenance of
elevation of character or force of intellect, than to live in the
society, and seek by preference the sympathy, of inferiors in mental
endowments. Why is it that we constantly see in life so much of
intellectual and moral promise followed by such inadequate performance,
but because the aspirant has compared himself only with those below
himself, and has not sought improvement or stimulus from measuring
himself with his equals or superiors? In the present state of social
life, this is becoming the general condition of men. They care less
and less for any sympathies, and are less and less under any personal
influences, but those of the domestic roof. Not to be misunderstood,
it is necessary that we should distinctly disclaim the belief that
women are even now inferior in intellect to men. There are women who
are the equals in intellect of any men who ever lived; and, comparing
ordinary women with ordinary men, the varied though petty details
which compose the occupation of women call forth probably as much of
mental ability as the uniform routine of the pursuits which are the
habitual occupation of a large majority of men. It is from nothing in
the faculties themselves, but from the petty subjects and interests
on which alone they are exercised, that the companionship of women,
such as their present circumstances make them, so often exercises a
dissolvent influence on high faculties and aspirations in men. If one
of the two has no knowledge and no care about the great ideas and
purposes which dignify life, or about any of its practical concerns
save personal interests and personal vanities, her conscious, and
still more her unconscious influence, will, except in rare cases,
reduce to a secondary place in his mind, if not entirely extinguish,
those interests which she cannot or does not share. Our argument here
brings us into collision with what may be termed the moderate reformers
of the education of women; a sort of persons who cross the path of
improvement on all great questions; those who would maintain the old
bad principles, mitigating their consequences. These say, that women
should be, not slaves nor servants, but companions, and educated for
that office (they do not say that men should be educated to be the
companions of women). But since uncultivated women are not suitable
companions for cultivated men, and a man who feels interest in things
above and beyond the family circle wishes that his companion should
sympathize with him in that interest, they therefore say, let women
improve their understanding and taste, acquire general knowledge,
cultivate poetry, art, even coquet with science, and some stretch their
liberality so far as to say, inform themselves on politics; not as
pursuits, but sufficiently to feel an interest in the subjects, and
to be capable of holding a conversation on them with the husband, or
at least of understanding and imbibing his wisdom.