Enfranchisement of women : $b Reprinted from the Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, for July 1851 — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Enfranchisement of women : $b Reprinted from the Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review, for July 1851
John Stuart Mill · en
indulgence. If there is any self-will in the man, he becomes either the
conscious or unconscious despot of his household. The wife, indeed,
often succeeds in gaining her objects, but it is by some of the many
various forms of indirectness and management.
Thus the position is corrupting equally to both; in the one it produces
the vices of power, in the other those of artifice. Women, in their
present physical and moral state, having stronger impulses, would
naturally be franker and more direct than men; yet all the old saws
and traditions represent them as artful and dissembling. Why? Because
their only way to their objects is by indirect paths. In all countries
where women have strong wishes and active minds, this consequence is
inevitable; and if it is less conspicuous in England than in some other
places, it is because English women, saving occasional exceptions, have
ceased to have either strong wishes or active minds.
We are not now speaking of cases in which there is anything deserving
the name of strong affection on both sides. That, where it exists, is
too powerful a principle not to modify greatly the bad influences of
the situation; it seldom, however, destroys them entirely. Much oftener
the bad influences are too strong for the affection, and destroy it.
The highest order of durable and happy attachments would be a hundred
times more frequent than they are, if the affection which the two sexes
sought from one another were that genuine friendship which only exists
between equals in privileges as in faculties. But with regard to what
is commonly called affection in married life,--the habitual and almost
mechanical feeling of kindliness and pleasure in each other's society,
which generally grows up between persons who constantly live together,
unless there is actual dislike,--there is nothing in this to contradict
or qualify the mischievous influence of the unequal relation. Such
feelings often exist between a sultan and his favorites, between a
master and his servants; they are merely examples of the pliability of
human nature, which accommodates itself, in some degree, even to the
worst circumstances, and the commonest nature always the most easily.