Oliver Constable, miller and baker, Vol. 2 (of 3) — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Oliver Constable, miller and baker, Vol. 2 (of 3)
John Stuart Mill · en
The Polleys’ standard was very little above that of the most
rudimentary Christians, whether in high places, in courts and alleys,
or in the bush and the jungle. The Polleys would do no murder, would
not pick or steal—unless in those adaptations and adulterations of
groceries, which had become part of a wide-spread system, with which
all trades complied, and which nobody, save a fanatic, dreamt of
defining as stealing, would prove chaste maids and matrons, would
not literally fall down and worship golden images, and for anything
farther would regularly attend chapel—of which the heads of the house
were members, and would contribute liberally and with great _esprit de
corps_ to the minister’s salary.
It did not strike Oliver that the Polleys were much exposed to the
temptation to break those commandments which they respected, and for
the rest, with regard to the grand spiritual lives beyond, these were
simply ignored and uncomprehended. Oliver feared there was a more
impassable miserable chasm between the Polleys’ mode of existence and
all that belongs to a higher life, than even the ghastly gulf which
cuts off the outcast in his crimes and wretchedness from purity and
peace, just as it was said of old that the publicans and harlots
were nearer the kingdom of heaven than their extremely respectable,
outwardly moral, nay, ostentatiously religious brethren. To do the
Polleys justice, they made no great barren profession of religion; they
contented themselves with being by inheritance and social politics
chapel people, and despising the members of a state and priest-ridden
church.
Oliver, in his arguments with Fan, had given all honour to the
essential virtues of his class; now it pained him intensely to be
forced to recognise wherein it fell short, even in precedent and
tradition, not to say in word and deed, of the standards and practices
of the more highly cultured and better educated classes.
Certainly truth was not confined to any rank, and flagrant deception
was confessedly committed by ladies and gentlemen. But these ladies and
gentlemen were not respectable members of their class and, unless in
outrageous instances, counted falsehood brought home to them worldly
dishonour, and concealed their lapses from truth with all their might.
But a certain amount of lying did not involve the same disgrace when
it came to light in Oliver’s class. Jack Dadd was singularly obtuse in
perceiving that the twists and turns which he gave to his words and
actions, in order to serve himself, and of which he actually boasted to
Oliver, in the sense of what some Americans would call ‘smart practice’
or as capital jokes, were neither more nor less than cunningly veiled
lies. As for the Polley girls, they indulged with the utmost freedom
in wild exaggerations, horribly prejudiced statements, and barefaced
fibbing when it suited their purpose, until Oliver hung his head and
almost groaned aloud.