The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Judicial Murder of Mary E. Surratt
John Stuart Mill · en
"The very frenzy of madness ruled the hour. Reason was swallowed up in
patriotic passion, and a feverish and intense excitement prevailed
most unfavorable to a calm, correct hearing and faithful repetition of
what was said, especially by the suspected. Again, and again, and
again the accused was catechised by detectives, each of whom was
vieing with the other as to which should make the most important
discoveries, and each making the examination with a preconceived
opinion of guilt, and with an eager desire, if not determination, to
find in what might be said the proofs of guilt. Again, the witnesses
testified under the strong stimulus of a promised reward for
information leading to arrest and followed by convictions."
The Bureau conducted the investigation on the preconceived theory,
adopted, as we have seen, by the Secretary of War, that the Confederate
Government was the source of the conspiracy; and, by lavishing promises
and rewards, it had no difficulty in finding witnesses who professed
themselves to have been spies on the rebel agents in Canada and who were
ready to implicate them and through them the President of the defunct
Confederacy in the assassination. Richard Montgomery and Sanford Conover,
who had been in personal communication with these agents during the past
year, were eagerly taken into the employ of the Bureau, and made frequent
trips to Canada, to return every time laden with fresh proofs of the
complicity of the rebels.
To illustrate how the Bureau of Military Justice dealt with witnesses who
happened to have been connected more or less closely with Booth, and who
were either reluctant or unable to make satisfactory disclosures, here are
two extracts from the evidence given on the trial of John H. Surratt in
1867.
The first is from the testimony of Lloyd, the besotted keeper of the
Surratt tavern:
"I was first examined at Bryantown by Colonel Wells. I was next
examined by two different persons at the Carroll prison. I did not
know either of their names. One was a military officer. I think some
of the prisoners described him as Colonel Foster. I saw a man at the
conspiracy trial as one of the Judges who looked very much like him. *
* * I told him I had made a fuller statement to Colonel Wells than I
could possibly do to him under the circumstances, while things were
fresh in my memory. His reply was that it was not full enough, and
then commenced questioning me whether I had ever heard any person say
that something wonderful or something terrible was going to take
place. I told him I had never heard anyone say so. Said he I have seen
it in the newspapers.