Through the mill: The life of a mill-boy — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
Through the mill: The life of a mill-boy
John Stuart Mill · en
that the weavers and spinners never tired of laughing over it.
But while Uncle Stanwood was ambitious enough in his business, seeking
“independence,” which, to the British tradesman, represents freedom
from work and therefore, “gentlemanliness,” though he knew the fine
art of window display and was a good pedler, he was never intended
by nature to impress the world with the fact of his presence in it.
He lacked will power. He was not self-assertive enough at critical
times. The only time when he did call attention to himself was when
he took “Bob,” our one-eyed horse, and peddled fish, humorously
shouting through the streets, “Mussels and cockles alive! Buy ’em
alive! Kill ’em as you want ’em!” At all other times, the “Blue Sign”
and the “Linnet’s Nest,” our public-houses, could lure him away from
his business very readily. Uncle Stanwood had a conspicuous artistic
nature and training, and it was in these public-houses where he could
display his talents to the best advantage. He could play a flute
and also “vamp” on a piano. True his flute-playing was limited to
“Easy Pieces,” and his piano “vamping” was little more than playing
variations on sets of chords in all the various keys, with every now
and then a one-finger-air, set off very well by a vamp, but he could
get a perfunctory morsel of applause for whatever skill he had, and
very few of the solo singers in concerts attempted to entertain in
those public-houses without having “Stan” Brindin “tickle it up” for
them. In regard to his piano-playing, uncle had unbounded confidence.
He could give the accompaniment to the newest ballad without much
difficulty. The singer would stand up before the piano and say, “Stan,
hast’ ’eard that new piece, just out in t’ music ’alls, ‘The Rattling
Seaman?’”
“No,” uncle would say, “but I know I can ‘vamp’ it for thee, Jud. Hum
it o’er a bar or two. What key is’t in?” “I don’t know _key_,” would
respond the singer, “but it goes like this,” and there would ensue a
humming during which uncle would desperately finger his set of chords,
cocking his ear to match the piano with the singer’s notes, and the
loud crash of a fingerful of notes would suddenly indicate that
connections had been made. Then, in triumph, uncle would say, “Let me
play the Introduction, Jud!” and with remarkable facility he would stir
the new air into the complex variations of his chords; he would “vamp”
up and down, up and down, while the singer cleared his throat, smiled
on the audience, and arranged his tie. Then pianist and singer, as
much together as if they had been practising for two nights, would go
together through a harmonious recital of how:
“_The Rattling Seaman’s jolly as a friar,
As jolly as a friar is he, he, he._”