The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning — Plato — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Plato · en
can there be any thing better than that which is most excellent? But
this is present with each of the divinities according to his own
order, as we have said, and also with every genus of the Gods. It is
necessary therefore that every divine nature should be established
immutably, abiding in its own accustomed manner. Hence from these
things the self-sufficiency, undefiled purity, and invariable sameness
of subsistence of the Gods is apparent. For if they are not changed
to a more excellent condition of being, as possessing that which is
best in their own nature, they are sufficient to themselves, and are
not in want of any good. And if they are not at any time changed to
a worse condition, they remain undefiled, established in their own
transcendencies. If also they guard the perfection of themselves
immutably, they subsist always with invariable sameness. What the
self-sufficiency therefore of the Gods is, what their immutability, and
what their sameness of subsistence, we shall in the next place consider.
The world then is said to be self-sufficient, because its subsistence
is perfect from things perfect, and a whole from wholes; and because
it is filled with all appropriate goods from its generating father.
But a perfection and self-sufficiency of this kind is partible, and is
said to consist of many things coalescing in one, and is filled from
separate causes according to participation. The order of divine souls
also, is said to be self-sufficient, as being full of appropriate
virtues, and always preserving the measure of its own blessedness
without indigence. But here likewise the self-sufficiency is in want
of powers. For these souls have not their intellections directed
to the same intelligibles; but they energize according to time,
and obtain the complete perfection of their contemplation in whole
periods of time. The self-sufficiency therefore of divine souls, and
the whole perfection of their life is not at once present. Again,
the intellectual world is said to be self-sufficient, as having its
whole good established in eternity, comprehending at once its whole
blessedness, and being indigent of nothing, because all life and all
intelligence are present with it, and nothing is deficient, nor does it
desire any thing as absent. But this, indeed, is sufficient to itself
in its own order, yet it falls short of the self-sufficiency of the
Gods. For every intellect is boniform, yet is not goodness itself,
nor primarily good; but each of the Gods is a unity, hyparxis and
goodness. The peculiarity however of hyparxis changes the progression
of the goodness of each. For one divinity is a perfective goodness,
another is a goodness connective of the whole of things, and another
is a collective goodness. But each is simply a goodness sufficient
to itself. Or it may be said, that each is a goodness possessing
the self-sufficient and the all-perfect, neither according to
participation, nor illumination, but by being that very thing which it
is.