The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p — Plato — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
because bodies which have generation are suspended from them; and the
essence of these is not allotted a subsistence in eternity, but in the
whole of time. They are junior, therefore, not as once beginning to
exist, but as being always generated, and as we have before observed,
subsisting in becoming to be, or perpetually rising into existence. For
every thing which is generated has not the whole of what it possesses
present at once, nor a simultaneous infinity, but an infinity which is
perpetually supplying. Thus, therefore, they are called junior, as
having a subsistence co-extended with time, and always advancing into
existence, and as possessing a renovated immortality.
Again, the delivery of the first fabrication is a communication and
generation of demiurgic powers, exempt from every thing which the
second fabrication produces proximately, a progression of production
from the unapparent into the apparent, and a division of uniform power
into the multiplied government of the world. But the formation of
bodies assimilates the junior Gods to the unapparent fabrication. For
that was the cause of bodies that rank as wholes, just as they are the
causes of partial bodies, at the same time exhibiting a diminution
of power. For of the body of which they are the makers and formers,
the demiurgus also is the cause; but they are the formers of partial
bodies, which are bodies endued with certain qualities. Hence body
indeed is simply unbegotten as from time, and incorruptible as was also
the opinion of Aristotle. “For,” says he, “there would be a vacuum if
body could be generated, external[91] to the body of the universe.
But this _particular_ body is corruptible, as being of a partial
nature; for the _wholes_ of the elements derived their subsistence
from _total_ fabrication. The accession, however, of the human soul
which remained[92] to be generated, assimilates the mundane Gods to the
paternal power. For it is the province of a father to generate life;
since the first father, and every father is the cause of life; the
intelligible father, indeed, of intelligible, but the intellectual of
intellectual, and the supermundane of supermundane life. And hence, the
mundane Gods who generate corporeal life are fathers. The fabrication,
however, adapted to these Gods, produces the nature of partial animals.
For this partial animal which is suspended from the immortal soul,
consists of soul and body. But the _dominion_ which the demiurgus
gave the junior Gods, excites their providential inspection, their
connective power, and their guardian comprehensions. For without these,
the bodies that are fashioned, and the mortal form of life, would
rapidly vanish into non-entity. Prior, therefore, to the generation
of these, the demiurgus made their ruling Gods to be the guardians and
saviours of them. In the junior Gods, therefore, there are demiurgic
powers, according to which they invest generated natures with forms;