The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
Conformably, also, to this doctrine of Plato concerning the sun, the
emperor Julian sublimely theologizes about this divinity in his very
elegant oration to him, from which the following is an extract. The
apparent and splendid orbicular sun is the cause of well-being to
sensible natures. And whatever we have asserted as flowing from the
mighty intellectual sun among the intellectual Gods,[108] the same
perfections the apparent sun communicates to apparent forms; the
truth of which will be clearly evinced by contemplating invisible
natures from the objects of sensible inspection. And in the first
place, is not light the incorporeal and divine form of that which
is diaphanous in energy? But whatever that which is diaphanous may
be, which is subjected to all the elements, and is their proximate
form, it is certain that it is neither corporeal nor mixed, nor does
it display any of the peculiar qualities of body. Hence, you cannot
affirm that heat is one of its properties, nor its contrary cold;
you can neither ascribe to it hardness nor softness, nor any other
tangible difference; nor attribute taste or smell as peculiarities of
its essence. For a nature of this kind, which is called forth into
energy by the interposition of light, is alone subject to the power of
sight. But light is the form of a diaphanous essence which resembles
that common matter the subject of bodies, through which it is every
where diffused; and rays are the summit, and as it were flower of
light, which is an incorporeal nature. According to the opinion of the
Phœnicians, however, who are skilled in divine science and wisdom, the
universally-diffused splendour of light is the unmingled energy of an
intellect perfectly pure. And this doctrine will be found agreeable to
reason, when we consider that since light is incorporeal, its fountain
cannot be body, but the pure energy of intellect, illuminating in its
proper habitation the middle region of the heavens: and from this
exalted situation scattering its light, it fills all the celestial orbs
with powerful vigour, and illuminates the universe with divine and
incorruptible light.
Whatever, likewise, we first perceive by the sight, is nothing but
a mere name of honourable labour, unless it receives the ruling
assistance of light. For how can any thing be visible, unless,
like matter, it is moved to the artificer that it may receive the
supervening investments of form? Just as gold in a state of simple
fusion is indeed gold, but is not a statue or an image till the
artificer invests it with form. In a similar manner all naturally
visible objects cease to be apparent, unless light is present with
the perceiver. Hence, since it confers vision on the perceiver, and
visibility on the objects of perception, it perfects two natures in
energy, sight and that which is visible. Perfections, however, are form
and essence; though perhaps an assertion of this kind is more subtle
than is suited to our present purpose.