The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Plato · en
But let us consider the order of the Parcæ by itself. For of these,
some think that Lachesis should be arranged as the first, but others
as the last of the three. And of the remaining two, some give a prior
arrangement to Atropos, and place her in the order of a monad, but
others to Clotho. Since, however, Plato in the Laws clearly says,
that Lachesis is the first, Clotho the second, and Atropos the third,
I think that what is said in the Republic should be referred to this
definite order in them, and that we should not make any innovation by
following the mutable opinions of interpreters. Socrates, therefore,
says, that Lachesis sings the past, but Clotho the present, and
Atropos the future; here also in a similar manner using an order of
division conformably to their energies. And to Lachesis indeed he
gives predominance, and a uniform dominion over the rest. But he
gives to Clotho a dominion subordinate to that of Lachesis, but
more comprehensive than the kingdom of Atropos. And to Atropos he
attributes the third kingdom, which is comprehended by both the others,
and is arranged under them. The multitude, therefore, are ignorant
that Socrates uses the parts of time as symbols of the comprehension
according to cause. For the past was once the future, and the present,
but the future[60] is not yet the past, but has the whole of its
essence in existing in some after time. We must assume, therefore,
the triple causes analogous to these three parts of time; and say
that the cause which is the most perfect, and the most comprehensive
of the others, sings the past, as the cause of the others, and the
source of their energy. For the past is comprehensive of the future
and the present. But the second cause is the present,[61] which
partly comprehends, and is partly comprehended. For this prior to its
being the present was the future. And the third cause, and which is
comprehended by both the others, is the future. For this requires the
present and the past, the one unfolding it, but the other bounding
its progression. Lachesis, therefore, is the first-effective cause,
comprehending the other causes in herself; but each of the remaining
Parcæ is comprehended by her. And Clotho indeed is allotted a superior,
but Atropos an inferior order. And on this account, Lachesis indeed
moves with both her hands, as giving completion in a greater and more
total manner to those things which are effected by them more partially.
But Clotho turns the spindle with her right, and Atropos with her
left hand, so far as the former indeed is the primary leader of the
energies, but the latter follows, and governs all things in conjunction
with the former. For in mortal animals, the right hand is the principle
of motion; and in wholes, the motion to the right is comprehensive of
the motion to the left hand. On this account, therefore, the triad
of the Fates, in the Laws and in the Republic, is divided by Plato
according to the same order, into first, middle, and last.