The works of Plato (Vol. 1 of 6) : $b A new and literal version chiefly from the text of Stallbaum — Plato — John Shaqi
The works of Plato (Vol. 1 of 6) : $b A new and literal version chiefly from the text of Stallbaum
Plato · en
12. _Socr._ What then if the laws should say: “Socrates, was it not
agreed between us that you should abide by the judgments which the city
should pronounce?” And if we should wonder at their speaking thus,
perhaps they would say, “Wonder not, Socrates, at what we say, but
answer, since you are accustomed to make use of questions and answers.
For come, what charge have you against us and the city, that you attempt
to destroy us? Did we not first give you being? and did not your father
through us take your mother to wife and beget you? Say then, do you find
fault with those laws amongst us that relate to marriage as being bad?”
I should say, “I do not find fault with them.” “Do you with those that
relate to your nurture when born, and the education with which you were
instructed? Or did not the laws, ordained on this point, enjoin rightly,
in requiring your father to instruct you in music and gymnastic
exercises?” I should say, rightly. Well then: since you were born,
nurtured, and educated through our means, can you say, first of all,
that you are not both our offspring and our slave, as well you as your
ancestors? And if this be so, do you think that there are equal rights
between us, and whatever we attempt to do to you, do you think you may
justly do to us in turn? Or had you not equal rights with your father,
or master, if you happened to have one, so as to return what you
suffered, neither to retort when found fault with, nor when stricken to
strike again, nor many other things of the kind; but that with your
country and the laws you may do so; so that if we attempt to destroy
you, thinking it to be just, you also should endeavour as far as you are
able, in return to destroy us, the laws, and your country, and in doing
this will you say that you act justly, you who, in reality, make virtue
your chief object? Or are you so wise as not to know that one’s country
is more honourable, venerable and sacred, and more highly prized both by
gods and men possessed of understanding, than mother and father, and all
other progenitors, and that one ought to reverence, submit to, and
appease one’s country, when angry, rather than one’s father, and either
persuade it or do what it orders, and to suffer quietly if it bids one
suffer, whether to be beaten, or put in bonds; or if it sends one out to
battle there to be wounded or slain, this must be done, for justice so
requires, and one must not give way, or retreat, or leave one’s post;
but that both in war, and in a court of justice, and every where, one
must do what one’s city and country enjoins, or persuade it in such
manner as justice allows: but that to offer violence either to one’s
mother or father is not holy, much less to one’s country? What shall we
say to these things, Crito? That the laws speak the truth or not?
_Cri._ It seems so to me.