The social contract & discourses — Jean-Jacques Rousseau — John Shaqi
The social contract & discourses
Jean-Jacques Rousseau · en
The _Discourse on the Arts and Sciences_, the earliest of the works
reproduced in this volume, is not in itself of very great importance.
Rousseau has given his opinion of it in the _Confessions_. "Full of
warmth and force, it is wholly without logic or order; of all my
works it is the weakest in argument and the least harmonious. But
whatever gifts a man may be born with, he cannot learn the art of
writing in a moment." This criticism is just. The first Discourse
neither is, nor attempts to be, a reasoned or a balanced production.
It is the speech of an advocate, wholly one-sided and arbitrary, but
so obviously and naively one-sided, that it is difficult for us to
believe in its entire seriousness. At the most, it is only a rather
brilliant but flimsy rhetorical effort, a sophistical improvisation,
but not a serious contribution to thought. Yet it is certain that this
declamation made Rousseau's name, and established his position as a
great writer in Parisian circles. D'Alembert even devoted the preface
of the _Encyclopædia_ to a refutation. The plan of the first Discourse
is essentially simple: it sets out from the badness, immorality and
misery of modern nations, traces all these ills to the departure from a
"natural" state, and then credits the progress of the arts and sciences
with being the cause of that departure. In it, Rousseau is already in
possession of his idea of "nature" as an ideal; but he has at present
made no attempt to discriminate, in what is unnatural, between good
and bad. He is merely using a single idea, putting it as strongly as
he can, and neglecting all its limitations. The first Discourse is
important not for any positive doctrine it contains, but as a key to
the development of Rousseau's mind. Here we see him at the beginning
of the long journey which was to lead on at last to the theory of the
_Social Contract_.