The World as Will and Idea — Schopenhauer — John Shaqi
The World as Will and Idea
Schopenhauer · German
But the same disinclination to repeat myself word for word, or to say the
same thing a second time in other and worse words, after I have deprived
myself of the better, has occasioned another defect in the first book of
this work. For I have omitted all that is said in the first chapter of my
essay “On Sight and Colour,” which would otherwise have found its place
here, word for word. Therefore the knowledge of this short, earlier work
is also presupposed.
Finally, the third demand I have to make on the reader might indeed be
tacitly assumed, for it is nothing but an acquaintance with the most
important phenomenon that has appeared in philosophy for two thousand
years, and that lies so near us: I mean the principal writings of Kant. It
seems to me, in fact, as indeed has already been said by others, that the
effect these writings produce in the mind to which they truly speak is
very like that of the operation for cataract on a blind man: and if we
wish to pursue the simile further, the aim of my own work may be described
by saying that I have sought to put into the hands of those upon whom that
operation has been successfully performed a pair of spectacles suitable to
eyes that have recovered their sight—spectacles of whose use that
operation is the absolutely necessary condition. Starting then, as I do to
a large extent, from what has been accomplished by the great Kant, I have
yet been enabled, just on account of my earnest study of his writings, to
discover important errors in them. These I have been obliged to separate
from the rest and prove to be false, in order that I might be able to
presuppose and apply what is true and excellent in his doctrine, pure and
freed from error. But not to interrupt and complicate my own exposition by
a constant polemic against Kant, I have relegated this to a special
appendix. It follows then, from what has been said, that my work
presupposes a knowledge of this appendix just as much as it presupposes a
knowledge of the philosophy of Kant; and in this respect it would
therefore be advisable to read the appendix first, all the more as its
content is specially related to the first book of the present work. On the
other hand, it could not be avoided, from the nature of the case, that
here and there the appendix also should refer to the text of the work; and
the only result of this is, that the appendix, as well as the principal
part of the work, must be read twice.