Voltaire's history of Charles XII, king of Sweden — Voltaire — John Shaqi
Voltaire's history of Charles XII, king of Sweden
Voltaire · en
Poniatowski would never have succeeded, and the mere notion of his
design would have cost him his life, had not a stronger power than
those on his side given the last blow to the Grand Vizir Chourlouli’s
fortune. The Sultan had a young favourite, who has since governed the
Ottoman Empire and been killed in Hungary in 1716, at the battle of
Petervaradin, gained over the Turks by Prince Eugene of Savoy. His name
was Coumourgi-Ali-Pasha; his birth much the same as that of Chourlouli;
he was the son of a coal-heaver--as the name signified--for Coumir is
Turkish for coal. The Emperor Achmet II, uncle of Achmet III, meeting
Coumourgi as a child in a wood near Adrianople, was so struck by his
great beauty that he had him taken to the seraglio. Mustapha, Mahomet’s
eldest son and successor, was taken with him, and Achmet III made him
his favourite; he was then only selic-tar-aga, sword-bearer to the
crown. His extreme youth did not allow him to stand for the office of
Grand Vizir, but his ambition was to make it. The Swedish faction could
never gain this favourite; he was never a friend of King Charles, or of
any other Christian prince, or their ministers, but on this occasion he
was unconsciously of service to the King. He united with the Sultana
Valida, and the leading officer of the Porte, to bring about the fall
of Chourlouli, whom they all hated. This old minister, who had served
his master long and well, was the victim of the caprice of a boy and
the intrigues of a stranger. He was deprived of his dignity and his
wealth, his wife, daughter of the last Sultan, taken from him, and
he himself banished to Cassa in Crimean-Tartary. The bul, i.e. the
seal of the Empire, was given to Numan Couprougli, grandson of the
great Couprougli who took Candia. This new Vizir was what misinformed
Christians hardly believe a Turk can be, a man of incorruptible
virtue and a scrupulous observer of the law, which he often set up in
opposition to the will of the Sultan.
He would not hear of a war against Russia, which he thought unjust
and unnecessary, but the same respect for the law which prevented him
from waging war against the Czar, made him punctilious in the duty of
hospitality to the King of Sweden. “The law,” he said to his master,
“forbids you to attack the Czar, who has done you no harm, but it
commands you to help the King of Sweden, who is an unfortunate Prince
in your dominions.”