Voltaire's history of Charles XII, king of Sweden — Voltaire — John Shaqi
Voltaire's history of Charles XII, king of Sweden
Voltaire · en
After the victory the King of Sweden hastened to Mittau, the capital
of Courland, and took it. All the towns of the Duchy surrendered at
discretion; it was rather a triumphal passage than a conquest. He
passed rapidly on to Lithuania, and conquered wherever he passed. And
he acknowledged that it was a great satisfaction to him to enter in
triumph the town of Birzen, where the King of Poland and the Czar had
plotted his ruin. It was here that he planned to dethrone the King of
Poland by the agency of the Poles themselves. When one day he was at
table, quite absorbed in the thought of his enterprise, and observing
his usual rule of abstinence in the midst of a profound silence,
appearing engrossed in his great plans, a German colonel, who was
present, said loud enough for the King to hear, that the meals which
the Czar and the King of Poland had made in the same place were very
different from these.
“Yes,” said the King, rising, “and I shall the more easily disturb
their digestions.” In fact, using a little diplomacy to assist his
arms, he did not delay to prepare for the event about which he had been
busy thinking.
The Government of Poland is an almost exact image of the old Celtic and
Gothic Government, which has been altered almost everywhere else. It is
the only state which has retained the name “republic,” with the royal
dignity.
Every nobleman has the right to vote at the election of the king, and
to stand for election himself. These fine privileges have corresponding
abuses; the throne is almost always put up for sale, and as a Pole
is seldom rich enough to buy it, it is often sold to foreigners. The
nobility defend their liberty against the king, and tyrannize over the
rest of the nation. The body of the people are slaves; such is the fate
of mankind, that the great majority are, in some way or another, kept
under by the minority. There the peasant does not sow his crops for
himself but for his lord, to whom he and his land and his very work
belong, and who can sell him, or cut his throat as if he were a beast
of the field. A lord is answerable to none but himself. Judgment can
only be given against him for a criminal action by an assembly of the
whole nation.
Nor can he be arrested until after his condemnation, so that he is
hardly ever punished. Many among them are poor, in which case they let
themselves out to the richer, and do the basest duties for a salary.
They would rather serve their equals than engage in trade, and while
taking care of their masters’ horses they call themselves electors of
kings and destroyers of tyrants.