The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918 — John Stuart Mill — John Shaqi
The Women's Victory—and After: Personal Reminiscences, 1911-1918
John Stuart Mill · en
But we soon found the parliamentary air thick with the intrigue and
gossip which had succeeded in defeating the Conciliation Bill. Rumours
and threats of resignation if any form of women's suffrage were carried
were rife. One "Right Honourable gentleman" would take an Irish
Nationalist on one side and remark casually that it was lamentable
to think, after the long struggle for Home Rule, that it would be
destroyed after all by the break up of the Government over women's
suffrage. Sir Edward Grey, intending to counteract these rumours,
rather intensified them by writing to a suffrage meeting in Glasgow
in December indicating that resignation was a game which two could
play at, and if antisuffrage Ministers resigned as a result of the
success of one or other of the suffrage amendments, then non-success
must equally be followed by the resignation of Ministers like himself
pledged to its support.
It has already been noted that the Session of 1912 had begun in
January; the Second Reading of the Government Reform Bill had been
taken in July; on the reassembling of Parliament for the autumn Session
October and November went by with no signs of any further progress with
the Bill. It was the constant subject of conversation and discussion
in the Lobbies, in the Press, and in general society, and many public
meetings were held, but no parliamentary progress was made; and when
this state of things continued over the Christmas recess, and the
lengthy Session of 1912 was prolonged into 1913, the more experienced
of suffragists were asking each other how it could be a physical
possibility to pass a controversial measure like a Reform Bill through
all its stages in both Houses of Parliament at the tail end of a
Session which had already lasted nearly thirteen months.